i don't know who in their right mind would lump the element and matrix together...

 

Since I'm assuming that comment was directed toward me, let me assure that I'm not.

My point was simply that the Element and the Fit do a fine job of covering the tall wagon/ box on wheels / carry-all niche. I don't see a strong business case for the Latitude / Stream because it is ostensibly the same formula as the Fit. If people want a powerful, larger vehicle, the Element is the next logical step (at least in terms of MSRP).

 

you may be right that the stream would have a hard time finding market in the US. but it is fundamentally different than the element in a couple of important ways. the element is very utilitarian, whereas the stream is a people-mover. the stream's interior isn't as flexible, it's smaller, probably won't come with AWD, doesn't have the B-pillar-less suicide doors, etc etc. it also has a third row of seats, making it much more suited for passenger use instead of utility/sport. similar, but still very different. whether it's different enough to warrant an entry into the american market, who knows? if the mazda 5 is successful, maybe honda will be prompted to make a move.

 

The Mazda5 has the same mpg problem the element does. It roughly the same as the much larger vans. But other than that, it is pretty much my dream vehicle (hey, we are not all street racers ).

I think Matrix/Vibe numbers would be more relevant. And I don't know if they make the case or not.

 

I concur that the element is nothing but impressive. I bought one after driving MANY vehicles because overall, it is quicker than reviews state and its actually lighter than many other cars it competes agains.

As to the concept drawing, i really like the back end but feel the front doesn't flow. I'd love to see an element / ridgeline style grille w/ those headlights. I think it would be a great look!