Dodge Charger received well by market
http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=103756
Buyer age, transaction price, etc reporting favorably.
Looks sharp in black!
Buyer age, transaction price, etc reporting favorably.
Looks sharp in black!
the charger is a "mid-size" car? :eh: is there a defined cut-off for the "mid-size" classification? the charger is 11 inches longer, 3 inches wider, 1 inch taller, and 600 pounds heavier than the accord.. and the accord is already pretty big, at least in my opinion.
edit: it's even bigger than a 300C...
edit: it's even bigger than a 300C...
A little chin music
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio - Rock 'n Roll capitol of the World
Originally Posted by 98CoupeV6
Charger = most illogically placed cruise control switch, ever.
That switch is signature Mercedes Benz..... been located there on all MB's since the 70's. No matter which car, when, or how it was redesigned, they always keep that cruise switch, and now it's infiltrated the Chrysler lineup.
1989 Mercedes 560 SEC:

I totally agree with you, however..... very illogical and horrible ergonomics. You tend to think it's the turn signal switch.
Originally Posted by M Type X
Ewww!!!! ewwwwwwww!!!!! non-Honda 80s interiors!!!!! Make the bad images go away!! 

Originally Posted by fastball
That switch is signature Mercedes Benz..... been located there on all MB's since the 70's. No matter which car, when, or how it was redesigned, they always keep that cruise switch, and now it's infiltrated the Chrysler lineup.
I totally agree with you, however..... very illogical and horrible ergonomics. You tend to think it's the turn signal switch.
I totally agree with you, however..... very illogical and horrible ergonomics. You tend to think it's the turn signal switch.
I drove a Charger for about 45mins and found it really, really unappealing. Handled okay but about the same plane as my 203k mile AV6. It had the horrible 2.7L so I won't bitch about that, I didn't expect it to have any power. The interior is just...completely counterintuitive. I guess it's classic Mercedes. GM is doing the best interiors right now out of all the Big 2.5...I love the new Buick interiors, the new Escalade's looks awesome, and I like the Malibu/Monte Carlo's quite a bit.
Originally Posted by 98CoupeV6
Didn't know that...I've only driven one Benz and it was a POS C230, I'm not a balla like you :chuckles:
I drove a Charger for about 45mins and found it really, really unappealing. Handled okay but about the same plane as my 203k mile AV6. It had the horrible 2.7L so I won't bitch about that, I didn't expect it to have any power. The interior is just...completely counterintuitive. I guess it's classic Mercedes. GM is doing the best interiors right now out of all the Big 2.5...I love the new Buick interiors, the new Escalade's looks awesome, and I like the Malibu/Monte Carlo's quite a bit.
I drove a Charger for about 45mins and found it really, really unappealing. Handled okay but about the same plane as my 203k mile AV6. It had the horrible 2.7L so I won't bitch about that, I didn't expect it to have any power. The interior is just...completely counterintuitive. I guess it's classic Mercedes. GM is doing the best interiors right now out of all the Big 2.5...I love the new Buick interiors, the new Escalade's looks awesome, and I like the Malibu/Monte Carlo's quite a bit.
Oh and I hate the new GM interiors.


