Notices
News & Rumors Archives Useful threads, previous Cars of the Week, and more.

2006 VW Golf GT - 170 hp from only 1.4 liters thru a turbo AND supercharger!

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 05:52 PM
  #31  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Is this a diesel? My question is how they are upping the compression ratio so much without autoignition.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 06:32 PM
  #32  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by Kestrel
Is this a diesel? My question is how they are upping the compression ratio so much without autoignition.
who said anything about a higher compression
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 06:36 PM
  #33  
stickyshifter's Avatar
stickyshifter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by asianautica
It seems like you have a bigger problem w/ VW coming up w/ this first instead of the technology itself. I bet if Honda came out w/ this, you would praise them for coming up w/ a 120HP/L 140ft-lb/L engine.
First of all, I think it's a terrible idea, pure and simple, Honda, Toyora, or VW. Super + Turbo on a small 1.4 engine, to me, is a risky idea. LIke it or not, that's what I think. If you don't think it's risky, more power to you.

But if you can't even take a criticism on an obvious possible risk that VW takes, don't try to turn that around and say that I will praise Honda for making a small engine. That is unfounded. I had not done that in the past, and I do not know what makes you think that.

:screwy:
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 06:45 PM
  #34  
stickyshifter's Avatar
stickyshifter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by asianautica
No, but all the argument against this is because VW came up w/ it and since they're unreliable, so this must not be a good thing.
But somehow you think this argument is not OK. With the VW's history of crap, it's pretty obvious that people will question the possible crappyness of its products.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #35  
98CoupeV6's Avatar
98CoupeV6
lots and lots of fail
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Default

Originally Posted by MrFatbooty
Okay so a 140 hp engine gets a little better mileage than a 170 hp engine. Roll your eyes at that, ha!
Does it seriously impress you that a car with 170HP gets 32MPG or are you just being argumentative? I don't see the cost v benefit here. Sure it'll win automobile mag tech of the year, but it does't wow you like my company's DSG tranny or dual exhaust/intake turbo system...at least not to me, but I'm a bit biased Maybe it's because they're showing the technology off in a Golf with modest powerm levels. Certainly not in line with the US intro to VTEC (NSX) or DSG (TT).
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 09:45 PM
  #36  
ED9man's Avatar
ED9man
driver
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,600
Likes: 0
Default

Too much shit to go wrong, bad idea.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #37  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by sherwood
who said anything about a higher compression
You're running higher boost. Your effective compression ratio and peak cylinder pressure go up.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 10:27 AM
  #38  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by Kestrel
You're running higher boost. Your effective compression ratio and peak cylinder pressure go up.
i never really thought of it that way
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 01:30 PM
  #39  
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Default

Originally Posted by Kestrel
You're running higher boost. Your effective compression ratio and peak cylinder pressure go up.
True story
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 04:55 AM
  #40  
whatever7's Avatar
whatever7
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

This is like the last VW bright idea, the W engine.

They made the W8 for the Passat but quickly dropped it. Frankly, it wasn't better than the Nissan V6 on paper. They also put it in the Phaeton, but there are less than 1000 Phaeton sold every year so maybe about 100 of them are the W12. And they are trying to put it in the Bugatti Veyron, which has been vaporware for years.

So all that research give you only hundreds of new w engines every year. It's not even worth it for the extra training expense you have to spend on the engineers and technicians.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:29 PM.