Notices
News & Rumors Archives Useful threads, previous Cars of the Week, and more.

Consumer Reports 2005 Top Ten - 9/10 are Japanese

Old Mar 6, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #11  
jaje's Avatar
jaje
HC Racer H5
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
From: KCK
Default Ford Focus Crash Safety

Safety Concerns: "Safety Concern: During the side impact test, the head of the rear passenger dummy struck the side header and the exterior sheet metal of the door causing a high head acceleration. Head impact events resulting in high accelerations have a higher likelihood of serious head trauma."

This leads to Poor Scoring and Safety Concern Note
Attached Files
File Type: doc
Focus Safety.doc (212.5 KB, 5 views)
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 04:23 PM
  #12  
jaje's Avatar
jaje
HC Racer H5
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
From: KCK
Default Corroboration

This is funny...just as I was posting on how the Focus really is a well balanced all around car (I consider safety and reliability to be of great importance). I posted the NHTSA results and now the IIHS really is coming down on how dangerous / deadly a Focus really is in a side collision.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050306/crash_tests_2.html

Small Cars Test Poorly for Side Impact

DETROIT (AP) -- The Dodge Neon, Ford Focus and Volkswagen New Beetle are among the small cars that got the lowest safety rating in new side-impact crash tests performed by the insurance industry, according to results released Sunday.

Eleven of the 13 cars tested earned a "poor," the lowest of four ratings, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety said. The Chevrolet Cobalt and the Toyota Corolla earned the second-highest rating of "acceptable," but only when they were tested with their optional side air bags. They earned "poor" ratings without the air bags.

Other vehicles that earned a "poor" rating were the Hyundai Elantra, Kia Spectra, Mazda 3, Mitsubishi Lancer, Nissan Sentra, Saturn Ion, Suzuki Forenza and Suzuki Aerio.

The institute's test simulates a severe crash. A barrier designed to resemble the front of a pickup or sport utility vehicle hits the side of the vehicle at 31 mph. A "poor" rating means a high chance of serious injury in a similar crash.

Four of the vehicles tested -- the Elantra, New Beetle, Forenza and Spectra -- have standard, head-protecting side air bags. But the institute's chief operating officer, Adrian Lund, said the cars had poor structure that failed to prevent injuries to the torso and pelvis.

Several of the vehicles offer optional side air bags, but the institute will only test those vehicles without side air bags unless the manufacturer provides a second vehicle with the option installed.

Toyota Motor Co. provided the Corolla with side air bags and General Motors Corp. provided the Cobalt and Saturn Ion. But even when it was tested with its optional side air bags, the Ion got a "poor" rating because the institute said it didn't adequately protect the driver's lower body.

GM said in a statement that the Cobalt and Ion meet or exceed all federal vehicle safety standards and got higher ratings in the institute's frontal crash tests.

The institute was most critical of the Neon, saying the car performed so poorly that the driver likely wouldn't have survived the crash. DaimlerChrysler AG defended the Neon, saying it meets federal safety standards and its performance is similar to other small cars.

"No single test can determine a vehicle's overall safety performance or how the vehicle will perform in a specific crash," DaimlerChrysler said in a statement.

Lund said the ratings were similar to frontal crash test ratings for small cars in 1997. Since then, manufacturers have redesigned those cars and now most get the highest safety rating in frontal crash tests.

"As manufacturers redesign their vehicles, we expect that small cars will get better in the side-impact test too," Lund said.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #13  
mayonaise's Avatar
mayonaise
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,181
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by jaje
This is funny...just as I was posting on how the Focus really is a well balanced all around car (I consider safety and reliability to be of great importance). I posted the NHTSA results and now the IIHS really is coming down on how dangerous / deadly a Focus really is in a side collision.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050306/crash_tests_2.html
i wonder how the civic did... they didn't even mention it
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 06:03 AM
  #14  
MtViewGuy88's Avatar
MtViewGuy88
Hopeful FIT owner
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mayonaise
i wonder how the civic did... they didn't even mention it
It will be interesting to see how the 8th-generation Civic does given that the new model's safety features was designed using the aid of Honda's recently-opened safety test facility here in the USA and the fact the new model will sport side-curtain airbags. Don't forget that Honda wants very high ratings for the European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) safety tests, so expect the 2006 Civic to probably get overall "Good" ratings from the IIHS, whose crash test methodology is very similar to how they do the EuroNCAP tests.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #15  
jaje's Avatar
jaje
HC Racer H5
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
From: KCK
Default

Originally Posted by mayonaise
i wonder how the civic did... they didn't even mention it
the 2001 honda civic coupe with sab was the first compact car to ever get 5 star compliance in NHTSA crash testing...the only other car that year was the volvo s80 (an incredible feat)...the sedan and hb got all 5 stars and one 4 star so they were all rated "good"
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:08 PM
  #16  
95AccordV6's Avatar
95AccordV6
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Default

I never care what Consumer Report says. Every year they have almost the same cars.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2005 | 11:47 PM
  #17  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 95AccordV6
I never care what Consumer Report says. Every year they have almost the same cars.
Perhaps because the same car manufacturers consistently put out quality cars?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 PM.