Notices
News & Rumors Archives Useful threads, previous Cars of the Week, and more.
View Poll Results: What do you think of the 7th gen Accord so far?
It's absolutely beautiful and kicks ass with 240HP
28
63.64%
Honda needs more luxury to compete with the Camry
0
0%
Honda needs more sport to compete with the Altima
3
6.82%
It is an excellent blend of sport/luxury but is ugly
13
29.55%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

2003 Accord Pictures

Old Jul 31, 2002 | 11:12 AM
  #101  
yianni64's Avatar
yianni64
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, Texas
Default

Originally posted by DVPGSR
Is that wood stock or aftermarket...it looks decent but the radio, layout of dash, and gagues still looks bad.
I'm not really a fan of wood trim . But that looks pretty good. But yeah, basically the wood trim is the last thing I think about as far as the interior goes.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2002 | 11:17 AM
  #102  
kazi's Avatar
kazi
Toyota Racing = Cheaters
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by KV_


I did say the Accord interior was top notch, but the Alt interior isn't just horrific like people try to make it seem especially if they never even sat in one.
I sat in one and took a test drive in an Altima with dark grey interior and the wood trim. It was horrible. The wood trim layout looks way out of place with the cumbersome center stack layout. The instrument panel piece looked awful and had not flow design. The plastic had a cheapness feel on the texture. I haven't seen one review that does not say anything negative about the Altima's interior.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2002 | 12:41 PM
  #103  
vasu's Avatar
vasu
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

photoshop a coupe with a back spoiler anyone?
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2002 | 01:03 PM
  #104  
iNteGraz92's Avatar
iNteGraz92
forever lurking
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 0
From: El Monte, CA
Default

wow that wood trim on the altima is HORRIBLE
maybe it would look better if the wood wasn't so damn red
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2002 | 03:10 PM
  #105  
yianni64's Avatar
yianni64
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, Texas
Default

Originally posted by kazi


I sat in one and took a test drive in an Altima with dark grey interior and the wood trim. It was horrible. The wood trim layout looks way out of place with the cumbersome center stack layout. The instrument panel piece looked awful and had not flow design. The plastic had a cheapness feel on the texture. I haven't seen one review that does not say anything negative about the Altima's interior.
Interior is really important to me, jsut as important as the outside styling. What do we look at while we drive, the interior infornt of us, and I think its really important to have a good layout. My 240SX's isnt that bad for a car from 1996, the seats are nice and so is the layout. The gauges are cool (SE model) but the led's on the HVAC system are hard to see. Not to mention the headroom blows.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2002 | 06:56 PM
  #106  
fastball's Avatar
fastball
A little chin music
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio - Rock 'n Roll capitol of the World
Default

So, the Accord is now a formidable contender in world class design, able to be mentioned in the same breath as BMW, VW, and Audi. This is the beginning of a new vehicle revolution, if you ask me. When was the last time a car in the low $20k range contended with cars costing twice as much? Kudos, Honda.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2002 | 07:10 PM
  #107  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally posted by fastball
So, the Accord is now a formidable contender in world class design, able to be mentioned in the same breath as BMW, VW, and Audi. This is the beginning of a new vehicle revolution, if you ask me. When was the last time a car in the low $20k range contended with cars costing twice as much? Kudos, Honda.
Um....no. You mean BMW as in 3 series $27k, VW as in Passat $21k up, and Audi as in A4 which costs $24k up. Those cars arent very expensive low 20k's -high 30's ...so theyre not any more $ than the accord. You would need to choose the most fully loaded EX V6 which will come close to $26k and up . that makes it mid-high $20k. So thats nothing to brag about, they cost the same, and just brings the accord down, since those vehicles offer some distinct features. The most fully loaded camry costs $31,484. and no, thats not a misprint.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2002 | 07:22 PM
  #108  
fastball's Avatar
fastball
A little chin music
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio - Rock 'n Roll capitol of the World
Default

Originally posted by 94UhkorGuy


Um....no. And anyway... for a car close to those listed above, you would need to choose the most fully loaded EX V6 which will come close to $26k . that makes it mid-high $20k
I was speaking in terms of fit, finnish, textures, and build quality. If you read the press list links they have aimed at BMW 5 series, MB, and the like in terms of fit and finnish. You can see in the pictures that it is for sure on par with any car costing ten grand more, it blows away anything in it's class and below, and has a touch of Lexus seamless fit where the center pod meets the dashboard. Having said that, the $18,000 DX model has the same fit and finnish as the $26,000 EX V-6, and they both approach cars costing twice as much.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2002 | 07:25 PM
  #109  
yianni64's Avatar
yianni64
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, Texas
Default

Originally posted by fastball


I was speaking in terms of fit, finnish, textures, and build quality. If you read the press list links they have aimed at BMW 5 series, MB, and the like in terms of fit and finnish. You can see in the pictures that it is for sure on par with any car costing ten grand more, it blows away anything in it's class and below, and has a touch of Lexus seamless fit where the center pod meets the dashboard. Having said that, the $18,000 DX model has the same fit and finnish as the $26,000 EX V-6, and they both approach cars costing twice as much.
:werd: I wrote my reply as you were, and by time I posted you already had. So I didnt wanna sound like a parrot. But yeah, exactly what you said.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2002 | 07:30 PM
  #110  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally posted by fastball


I was speaking in terms of fit, finnish, textures, and build quality. If you read the press list links they have aimed at BMW 5 series, MB, and the like in terms of fit and finnish. You can see in the pictures that it is for sure on par with any car costing ten grand more, it blows away anything in it's class and below, and has a touch of Lexus seamless fit where the center pod meets the dashboard. Having said that, the $18,000 DX model has the same fit and finnish as the $26,000 EX V-6, and they both approach cars costing twice as much.
ah.... the same can be read/said about the fit and finish of the new camry. Hondas always been known for cheap interior plastics etc... and its about time their doing something about it.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 AM.