Notices

lowest stock 1/4

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 8, 2002 | 07:45 AM
  #1  
red GS-R's Avatar
red GS-R
Thread Starter
shhhh...just be quiet.
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: kc
Default lowest stock 1/4

i know, the official time is like 14.9 or whatever, but what's the lowest anyone's ever ran in the quarter with a stock ITR? I've heard of people getting 14.9's in stock GSRs so....
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2002 | 04:24 PM
  #2  
kabob's Avatar
kabob
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Land of Steers and Queers :o
Default

Plenty of people have gotten lower stock times than a 14.9. Hell, average 1/4 times are lower than that.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2002 | 05:00 PM
  #3  
b00gers's Avatar
b00gers
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 58,579
Likes: 0
From: Lll
Default

probably mid14
__________________
.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2002 | 09:58 PM
  #4  
Shingoblade-GSR's Avatar
Shingoblade-GSR
Hellsing Agency
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Default

I've heard of some 14.3's.

Shingo
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2002 | 05:15 AM
  #5  
Mike99's Avatar
Mike99
U.S. CoastGuard
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default

What about the traps, what are the highest Verified traps(not heresay). I think the average is about what, 95mph?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 03:15 PM
  #6  
tehsuxGST's Avatar
tehsuxGST
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

a stock type r can run a 14.3? hm, the stock one that i raced didnt seem that fast...
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 04:17 PM
  #7  
red GS-R's Avatar
red GS-R
Thread Starter
shhhh...just be quiet.
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: kc
Default

driver.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 04:42 PM
  #8  
tehsuxGST's Avatar
tehsuxGST
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

i guess so, i just thought it was kinda weird cuz my friend with a stock WRX ran a 14.1, which would be approx 1.5-2 cars from 14.3. from the races that ive seen, stock WRXs smoke stock ITRs from stops and rolls, way more than just 2 or even 3 car lengths. WRX has the awd advantage in the 1/4 too. im not calling BS on anyone, i just didnt think that a fwd N/A would be able to come close to an awd FI in the 1/4.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 03:12 PM
  #9  
ls/vtec-crx's Avatar
ls/vtec-crx
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

I have run my Type R here in Calgary, Canada at a 14.6 @ 96mph and our elevation is at 3800ft so at sea level we calculated it about 13.9.

But yeah that was with AEM CAI and Apexi N1 Cat-back exhuast. So not really stock.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 04:54 PM
  #10  
kabob's Avatar
kabob
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Land of Steers and Queers :o
Default

Originally posted by tehsuxGST
i guess so, i just thought it was kinda weird cuz my friend with a stock WRX ran a 14.1, which would be approx 1.5-2 cars from 14.3. from the races that ive seen, stock WRXs smoke stock ITRs from stops and rolls, way more than just 2 or even 3 car lengths. WRX has the awd advantage in the 1/4 too. im not calling BS on anyone, i just didnt think that a fwd N/A would be able to come close to an awd FI in the 1/4.
WRX's have their fastest part of the 1/4 at the launch with sub 2-second 60' times but AWD drivetrain loss and weight slow down the Rex. I'm almost positive a Type R would catch up with one with a little bit more room.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:43 PM.