Notices

shooping for tires

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 20, 2004 | 08:04 AM
  #11  
Pants's Avatar
Pants
Rockin' Your Socks Off!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO USA
Default

Originally Posted by c_rogue69
here's how I see it, if I'm getting 2 new tires, I'd put them on the front since they'd be fresh and have a less of a chance of popping or leaking. I steer with the front tires, so I'd like new one on there.
One of the reasons for putting new tires on the rear on FWD cars is that you don't have any control (steering or throttle) over the rear wheels.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 12:37 PM
  #12  
GSRnold's Avatar
GSRnold
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

There's a set of Falken 512's on ebay for $180. It's for 4 though. That's $45 a tire. Is that cheap?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...spagename=WDVW
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 02:43 PM
  #13  
TeHJuSTiN's Avatar
TeHJuSTiN
NAM #0001
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 0
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

Originally Posted by MrFatbooty
See the little essay I typed out above as to why that's a bad idea.
I agree somewhat, but more than likely he's not going to put bald tires on the rear. If he was going to do that, might as well purchase four tires.

When I purchased new tires for the rear of my car, the front ones only had about 6k miles on them so I went ahead and rotated them. I have experienced nothing that you have mentioned althought correcting oversteer in a FWD is fairly easy as long as you dont over-correct.

Also leaving older ones on the front constantly will cause you to have to purchase two tires more often.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 06:59 PM
  #14  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

I'm not saying he should put bald tires on the rear. He said the replacement tires are needed for the front, which implies that the rears still have a decent amount of tread left. I meant to buy two new tires, move the rears with decent tread left to the front, and put the new tires on the rear.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #15  
TeHJuSTiN's Avatar
TeHJuSTiN
NAM #0001
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 0
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

Originally Posted by MrFatbooty
I'm not saying he should put bald tires on the rear. He said the replacement tires are needed for the front, which implies that the rears still have a decent amount of tread left. I meant to buy two new tires, move the rears with decent tread left to the front, and put the new tires on the rear.
The only reason I'm saying to put the new tires on the front is because, on FWD's especially, the tires wear more. And to that, I added as long as the tires he would rotate to the rear wouldn't be bald, then oversteer wouldn't be much of a problem.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #16  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Okay, so moving the old rears to the front will wear them down sooner. But putting the new tires on the front will also wear those down sooner. Either way you're shortening the lifespan of a pair of tires.

It's not like if you put new tires on the front and older tires on the rear you're going to magically turn your car into some kind of tail-happy unsafe road sled. It just decreases your margin of safety in emergency driving situations.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:45 PM
  #17  
IntegraR's Avatar
IntegraR
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Default

Originally Posted by GSRnold
There's a set of Falken 512's on ebay for $180. It's for 4 though. That's $45 a tire. Is that cheap?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...spagename=WDVW

thanks... seems like u are the only one who answered my question... I asked for a link and everyone started typing essays.... just playin y'all thanks for all the info but I think I might get the falken's...
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:55 PM
  #18  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Well, you didn't say what *kind* of tires you were looking for.

Like I said, I typed in that size on tirerack and there were like 30 different tires in your budget
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 08:11 PM
  #19  
GSRnold's Avatar
GSRnold
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by IntegraR
thanks... seems like u are the only one who answered my question... I asked for a link and everyone started typing essays.... just playin y'all thanks for all the info but I think I might get the falken's...
No problem. Have fun at the track!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #20  
TheOtherDave™'s Avatar
TheOtherDave™
Apathy Kills
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 60,714
Likes: 0
From: The Left Lane
Default

Rather than debate the ideal position for a pair of new tyres on a FWD vehicle...I have a more realistic tack for this discussion to embark upon....buying a full set of four, yes, four tires at once. :eek3:

--------
Back when I ran 14" x 6.5" rims on my GTi, and I put a hell of a lot of miles on the car, I ran Yokohama AVID H4 tyres in the 205/55 R14 size. They had decent durability, fine grip in the dry and exemplary grip in the wet. Snow is another issue entirely, and I can't speak to that. But for a sport-oriented, reasonably long-wearing tyre, I'd recommend the Yokohama AVID series. [or its successor where applicable]
__________________
:: :ToDspin: - supermod - but who gives a shit?

:: HAN Integra FAQ: If, by some miracle, yours hasn't been stolen... check it out!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:38 PM.