Notices

which is faster

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 02:39 PM
  #1  
accorddx91's Avatar
accorddx91
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default which is faster

Between the gsr and itr which will get me better times at the track stock? what times can i expect? thanks
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 02:40 PM
  #2  
Asahi's Avatar
Asahi
Administrator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

15.5 for a stock GSR vs 14.7 for a stock Type-R
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 02:55 PM
  #3  
TyPe_R_GuY's Avatar
TyPe_R_GuY
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default

yes, but i am sure these times are at SEA LEVEL, cause there is not way a stock GSR or a Type R would come even close to running that here lol
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 03:32 PM
  #4  
George Knighton's Avatar
George Knighton
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 1
From: Virginia (Besieged)
Default

LOL.... That's what you get for living in Utah.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 05:36 PM
  #5  
97 TYPE-R 312's Avatar
97 TYPE-R 312
ITR Mid Atlantic Director
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by George Knighton
LOL.... That's what you get for living in Utah.

Guys, times vary anywhere and with different driving styles. Just an example, I went 14.3@96 bone stock.

-Victor
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 05:46 PM
  #6  
Asahi's Avatar
Asahi
Administrator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TyPe_R_GuY
yes, but i am sure these times are at SEA LEVEL, cause there is not way a stock GSR or a Type R would come even close to running that here lol

Regardless times will change proportionally. They may both be slower but an R is always faster than a GSR by more than 1/2 sec stock.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 10:05 PM
  #7  
TyPe_R_GuY's Avatar
TyPe_R_GuY
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default

haha yeah high elevation SUCKS with N/A, and yes thats correct, an R will be quicker in the 1/4 as long as they both have decent drivers :-)
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 02:09 PM
  #8  
Misfit's Avatar
Misfit
Some Kinda Hate
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 97 TYPE-R 312
Guys, times vary anywhere and with different driving styles. Just an example, I went 14.3@96 bone stock.

-Victor
I went 14.1 with a spoon drop in filter. So there is a lot of variables with this one.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 06:07 PM
  #9  
97 TYPE-R 312's Avatar
97 TYPE-R 312
ITR Mid Atlantic Director
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by Misfit
I went 14.1 with a spoon drop in filter. So there is a lot of variables with this one.
Correct.

I then went 14.0@97 MPH, consistant 2.0 60ft's with only 15" accord steelies with M/T slicks

I guess we could go on and on with this. The debate is an easy winner for the R no matter where you go in it.

-Victor
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #10  
George Knighton's Avatar
George Knighton
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 1
From: Virginia (Besieged)
Default

You guys are making my 13.8 sound not so quick.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 PM.