Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Gun Crew - scope suggestion

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 06:51 PM
  #1  
clickwir's Avatar
clickwir
Thread Starter
Floppy Death! noES!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 0
From: Scranton, PA
Default Gun Crew - scope suggestion

I got a Ruger 10/22 stainless steel with synthetic stock. It's a nice gun. Having a lot of fun shooting it. Put about 200-230 rounds through it so far.

At 100 yards, it's really hard to see specific spots on the target as the sights pretty much cover the whole target. I want to see how far and accurate I can get with it, so I need a scope.

3-9x40 seems to be common, so I'll probably go with something in that range. Well, I should say that 3-9x40 is probably the least I'm looking for. If something has more zoom and a bigger objective, I won't complain. A bigger objective would be nice, for later in the day shooting.

Something like this seems pretty nice: http://www.shopbarska.com/Hunting_Sc...PRO_SCOPE.html
And for $80, I might be able to swing that. I like the illumination too, that will help in low light conditions. During the winter, it's very easy for it to get pitch black out by 6 or 7pm. So when I get out of work, I don't have much light to work with but still want to shoot.

That's the top end though, I was really hoping to try and stay under $60.

Oh, I'd like it in silver, but that really limits my options. So I'll probably go with just a black.

I've read that having a 1" tube provides better picture. Yes/no? (I would assume that bigger = better when it comes to image quality/clarity, but what's a minimum I should stay above?)

Anyone have anything good or bad about Barska? Other suggestions?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 06:11 AM
  #2  
spanky's Avatar
spanky
I go duffy on dem bitches
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 28,248
Likes: 0
From: Gonzales, Louisiana
Default

I have two Mueller APVs I bought from this guy. He's in AK but I got both of them (separate orders) within a week.

http://www.mizzoumuleguns.com/

eta:
http://www.mizzoumuleguns.com/id12.html
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 06:29 AM
  #3  
shirley's Avatar
shirley
CBOTY 2010
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 34,786
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

i'll say it again ... find a decent 4x scope and be done. it's a .22 at 100 yards you are pushing the guns limits for a beginner / average user and 4x is more than enough for a .22

and i wish $80 = top end scope :hs:
i paid $350 for the redfield on my .270 and its middle of the road, the one for my AR was $500 and that was a steal. if you step down to a 4x you can pick something up in the 60-80 range thats way better glass than any $50 3-9 or 3-12 is going to be. just my 2 cents
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:30 AM
  #4  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

i like my ACOG
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 12:28 PM
  #5  
clickwir's Avatar
clickwir
Thread Starter
Floppy Death! noES!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 0
From: Scranton, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Snoopy
i like my ACOG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance...tical_Gunsight

The radioactive tritium light source has to be replaced every 8–12 years, since it gradually loses its brightness due to radioactive decay.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 12:29 PM
  #6  
shirley's Avatar
shirley
CBOTY 2010
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 34,786
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

ACOGs = cash money :hs:
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #7  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

:chuckles:

i personally dont find the light provided by the tritium bright enough as it is :shrug:
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 01:08 PM
  #8  
BetterBob's Avatar
BetterBob
Nobama
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,961
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Snoopy
:chuckles:

i personally dont find the light provided by the tritium bright enough as it is :shrug:

Yes, but there is a comforting feeling when your gun sets off a Geiger Counter.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #9  
b00gers's Avatar
b00gers
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 58,579
Likes: 0
From: Lll
Default

.22lr at 100 yds starts to get tricky. at the point you're looking at finding the ammo that your gun is abolutely constistant in. and braska...boo. get something nicer. the difference at 100yd with a cheap scope and even midlevel is dramatic. I would spend at the very least double that...especially for 100yds.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 01:21 PM
  #10  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

Originally Posted by BetterBob
Yes, but there is a comforting feeling when your gun sets off a Geiger Counter.
my life expectancy isnt too good anyways
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:46 PM.