GSR im vs Type R im
#11
Former Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oakland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by -KangaRod-
BAH! more faulty information. The B18C1 isn't dual plennum @ all. Thats weak. Oh well, untill I have the money to develop my own indefinitely variable intake (a-la BMW) I'll just stick to my type r, with illusions of a victor-x one day....
BAH! more faulty information. The B18C1 isn't dual plennum @ all. Thats weak. Oh well, untill I have the money to develop my own indefinitely variable intake (a-la BMW) I'll just stick to my type r, with illusions of a victor-x one day....
#13
Originally posted by -KangaRod-
I thought the victor x was the manifold to have. Who makes a better one right now?
I thought the victor x was the manifold to have. Who makes a better one right now?
It would be great for turbo or drag, but forget about it on an autox car.
#14
Former Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oakland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by qtiger
I'd stick with Skunk2 unless you are upping your redline with some aggressive cams (Skunk2 2+, Jun3, Toda B, C), because the victor x really only makes power above 7000 RPMs.
It would be great for turbo or drag, but forget about it on an autox car.
I'd stick with Skunk2 unless you are upping your redline with some aggressive cams (Skunk2 2+, Jun3, Toda B, C), because the victor x really only makes power above 7000 RPMs.
It would be great for turbo or drag, but forget about it on an autox car.
#16
I wouldn't put the Victor x on a street car unless it was turbo. Don't ignore the Skunk2 as just a ITR manifold, it shows some nice gains over OE. It is only based on the ITR manifold.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alejandro37f
Integra & 97-01 Integra Type-R
21
05-25-2007 09:53 AM
JDM_dc2
Parts Classifieds
7
07-12-2004 01:41 PM