Notices
Engine Swaps, Tech & Tuning Swaps, N/A Performance, Forced Induction, Engine Management, & Troubleshooting

No axleback = better mileage???

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-17-2002, 07:46 PM
  #1  
SiClone
X-Moder8er
Thread Starter
 
SiClone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sesame Street
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default No axleback = better mileage???

Here's the deal... Some guy offered me an amount I couldn't refuse for my Mugen Twin Loop axleback. So I jacked up the Si, started to untorque the bolts, and snap and crunch the bolts broke off. Anyway, I did this last Friday and since my new exhaust (Tananbe Super Hyper Medallion) will be here on Thursday, I figured it wasn't worth my time to get the bolts off, get new bolts, and put the stock axleback on. So since then, I've been running with no axleback. It's hella loud and annoying, but the weird thing is that I've gotten the best gas mileage I've ever had with this car. I still drve the same with occasional visits to vtec if ou know what I mean:naughty:. I'm not empty yet, but it seems like I'm on pace to get well over 300 miles on this tank.:thumbup: I never hit 300 miles per tank. Now I did just switch back to stock 15's, but I was also on 14" steelies for 2 weeks prior, so that has nothing to do with it. Just kinda weird....
Old 06-17-2002, 08:03 PM
  #2  
qtiger
Moderator
 
qtiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm guessing it is you driving the car gentler due to noise, even if it is unconciously. :dunno:

A straight through like the twinloop isn't going to affect your engine that much.
Old 06-17-2002, 08:07 PM
  #3  
gritsak
Member
 
gritsak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: dayton, ohio
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

less backpressure is better for gas mileage
Old 06-17-2002, 08:55 PM
  #4  
Bl@ck
Sinner
 
Bl@ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NoVA
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

plus you have to think about the fact that you have less weight due to the missing exhaust section...
Old 06-18-2002, 04:26 AM
  #5  
1stGenCRXer
GWAKS- Tech Geekifier
 
1stGenCRXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The missing weight doesn't make up for that much in the gas economy view. What is more likely is that your stock muffler was restrictive and possibly clogging, in which case, relieving the back pressure and increasing the exhaust velocity jumped the VE of the engine, which is good for better gas mileage.
__________________
-Harry
AIM: NDcissive
CRX and Pre '92 Civic, Engine Tech and Tuning, & Track and Autocross Forum Mod
Old 06-18-2002, 07:25 AM
  #6  
SiClone
X-Moder8er
Thread Starter
 
SiClone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sesame Street
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I never had a stock muffler on it at all. I bought it with the Twin Loop on it. I was going to put a stock one on. As for the weight issue, the Twin Loop weighed less than 20 lbs when I shipped it out, so that is negligible. As for my driving habits, they're still pretty much the same. Heck, when I went down to Madison to pick up the GSR rims, I didn't even get 300 miles per tank. It was all highway, with 14" steelies, but at 80-90 mph speeds:naughty: ... These damn Si's do rev very high at these speeds, so it doesn't help gas mileage...
Old 06-18-2002, 02:09 PM
  #7  
Weston
Member
 
Weston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lafayette, CO
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Less restriction lets the engine run more efficiently, which means better MPG. Good luck replacing those bolts you broke... (I'm assuming you have the spring loaded bolts.) I broke one of them on my Teg and it cost me $9.23 at the Honda dealer for a new one and all I got was the bolt, no spring! I couldn't find anything that would work anywhere else. I almost had a $1 solution working that consisted of a bolt, a nut, and a washer, but I decided to go with OEM rather than spending more time half-assing it.
Old 06-18-2002, 02:19 PM
  #8  
1stGenCRXer
GWAKS- Tech Geekifier
 
1stGenCRXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Weston
Less restriction lets the engine run more efficiently, which means better MPG.
Not 100% true, but I don't think it's worth going into a whole schpeel on the theory and application.
Old 06-18-2002, 06:20 PM
  #9  
Bl@ck
Sinner
 
Bl@ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NoVA
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by 1stGenCRXer
The missing weight doesn't make up for that much in the gas economy view.
every little bit helps
Old 06-18-2002, 08:29 PM
  #10  
SiClone
X-Moder8er
Thread Starter
 
SiClone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sesame Street
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Weston
Less restriction lets the engine run more efficiently, which means better MPG. Good luck replacing those bolts you broke... (I'm assuming you have the spring loaded bolts.) I broke one of them on my Teg and it cost me $9.23 at the Honda dealer for a new one and all I got was the bolt, no spring! I couldn't find anything that would work anywhere else. I almost had a $1 solution working that consisted of a bolt, a nut, and a washer, but I decided to go with OEM rather than spending more time half-assing it.
Yea, they're the stock spring loaded ones. I have plenty of springs (from 2 other exhaust swaps). But like I said, the new exhaust wll be here in 2 days so it's not worth bothering to get them out....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
solboy
92+ Civic/EL & Del Sol
4
10-22-2003 12:55 PM
9600baud
Parts Classifieds
3
09-21-2003 10:00 PM
HouseofKolorEX
92+ Civic/EL & Del Sol
19
05-03-2003 11:22 AM
'99EJ8
92+ Civic/EL & Del Sol
2
04-08-2003 01:51 AM



Quick Reply: No axleback = better mileage???



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 PM.