Notices
Engine Swaps, Tech & Tuning Swaps, N/A Performance, Forced Induction, Engine Management, & Troubleshooting

twin turbo on an I4?

Old Nov 27, 2002 | 03:54 AM
  #11  
TeHJuSTiN's Avatar
TeHJuSTiN
NAM #0001
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 0
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

It'd give you 600hp but it's going to take a lot more to do it than if you just used a single turbo.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2002 | 04:44 AM
  #12  
1stGenCRXer's Avatar
1stGenCRXer
GWAKS- Tech Geekifier
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Default

Originally posted by MrFatBooty
I can't tell if these are running in parallel or not. It looks like cylinders 1 and 3 feed one of the turbos while cyls 2 and 4 feed the other. That doesn't really make much sense to me.
That's pretty much what they're doing, but if you look, the turbo on the left appears to be a smaller mitsu style turbo, while I'm pretty sure the one on the right is a turbonetics T4 or larger, can't really tell by scale too well in the pic, but they definately are different sizes. In that respect it could be considered sequential I suppose, since the smaller turbo is going to spool first...
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2002 | 04:58 AM
  #13  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Originally posted by MrFatBooty
I'm sure it does, but you can make 600 hp with a single turbo with a lot less fuss.
Originally posted by TeHJuSTiN
It'd give you 600hp but it's going to take a lot more to do it than if you just used a single turbo.
Come on, you could at least try a little harder than that.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2002 | 09:06 AM
  #14  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
Thread Starter
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

heres the site with some specs: http://www.speedoptions.com/features/cars.php?carID=28
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2002 | 01:59 PM
  #15  
M.D.'s Avatar
M.D.
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: WA.
Default

Twin turbo on a inline 4 is for show purposes.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2002 | 12:10 PM
  #16  
SuperSlow87's Avatar
SuperSlow87
H-A G/\|v|3R
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: San Ho, Cali
Default

Isn't that an SR?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2002 | 12:19 PM
  #17  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
Thread Starter
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

no thats an H22
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2002 | 05:34 PM
  #18  
inspyral's Avatar
inspyral
のんびり~(´ε`)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 1
From: San Jo, Cali
Default

It's not practical at all for any kind of a street setup. Unless you have the kind of money A'PEXi put into R&D in order to get that running properly(not to mention making it work as an FR setup), then it's not even an option, really.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2002 | 05:40 PM
  #19  
1stGenCRXer's Avatar
1stGenCRXer
GWAKS- Tech Geekifier
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Default

Originally posted by inspyral
It's not practical at all for any kind of a street setup. Unless you have the kind of money A'PEXi put into R&D in order to get that running properly(not to mention making it work as an FR setup), then it's not even an option, really.
It's a FF car:
[img]www.speedoptions.com/features/cars/28/pic01.jpg[/img]
They put their money from R&D into making it a reverse rotation engine so that they could use that fancy schmancy 6 speed gear box. I have an old magazine on it somewhere... They had to reverse engineer the cams to do it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:49 PM.