Cons to turbo an automatic D16Y8
Ok, I know I'll get the usual swap the tranny but indulge me. What are the cons to boost my auto and what are the forseeable upgrades needed?
Thanks. :wiggle:
Thanks. :wiggle:
Honda's automatic transmissions arent really designed to handle a lot of power so like the old cliche' ... I'd suggest a transmission swap. You might be able to find a shop that builds them though.
Ok, since nobody really posted anything that could be thought of as more than hearsay, here goes.
Honda transmissions were not designed to hold much more power than stock. The clutch packs and bands wear out and fail if you shove too much power at them, which leaves you with a paperweight that costs a couple grand to replace. The alternative is to upgrade everything with items from Level 10, but that usually costs about as much as a new transmission as well.
Auto trannies do weigh more, but only by about 25 lbs. There is also not any more noticable lag over a manual car, provided you aren't trying to get boost from a roll. From a launch you can brake stall along with selecting first, but again, that heats up the fluid and contributes to early tranny failure.
A higher stall torque convertor will help a lot too.
All told, it's cheaper both upfront and in the long run to just do a manual conversion if you plan on boosting much at all.
Honda transmissions were not designed to hold much more power than stock. The clutch packs and bands wear out and fail if you shove too much power at them, which leaves you with a paperweight that costs a couple grand to replace. The alternative is to upgrade everything with items from Level 10, but that usually costs about as much as a new transmission as well.
Auto trannies do weigh more, but only by about 25 lbs. There is also not any more noticable lag over a manual car, provided you aren't trying to get boost from a roll. From a launch you can brake stall along with selecting first, but again, that heats up the fluid and contributes to early tranny failure.
A higher stall torque convertor will help a lot too.
All told, it's cheaper both upfront and in the long run to just do a manual conversion if you plan on boosting much at all.
__________________
-Harry
AIM: NDcissive
CRX and Pre '92 Civic, Engine Tech and Tuning, & Track and Autocross Forum Mod
-Harry
AIM: NDcissive
CRX and Pre '92 Civic, Engine Tech and Tuning, & Track and Autocross Forum Mod
It's not hearsay. I've driven automatic turbos, and the first 2-3K RPM's are horrible until the turbo spools up. At least with a manual car you have the chance of starting with the turbo spooled up. Add on to that the fact that Honda engines make very little low end torque and the automatic transmissions have only 4 gears, and thus, longer gearing than the 5 speeds, and you have one very annoying bit of turbo lag. Will it be fast than before? Probably. Are you going to get annoyed that every time you hit the go pedal the car seems to hesitate a little? Probably.
Originally Posted by Kestrel
I've driven automatic turbos, and the first 2-3K RPM's are horrible until the turbo spools up.
Originally Posted by 1stGenCRXer
There is also not any more noticable lag over a manual car, provided you aren't trying to get boost from a roll. From a launch you can brake stall along with selecting first, but again, that heats up the fluid and contributes to early tranny failure.
A higher stall torque convertor will help a lot too.
A higher stall torque convertor will help a lot too.
Originally Posted by Kestrel
Add on to that the fact that Honda engines make very little low end torque and the automatic transmissions have only 4 gears,
Originally Posted by Kestrel
and thus, longer gearing than the 5 speeds, and you have one very annoying bit of turbo lag.
__________________
-Harry
AIM: NDcissive
CRX and Pre '92 Civic, Engine Tech and Tuning, & Track and Autocross Forum Mod
-Harry
AIM: NDcissive
CRX and Pre '92 Civic, Engine Tech and Tuning, & Track and Autocross Forum Mod
so would you guys say go turbo w/ auto or just wait for a n/a swap? I prob would do a tranny swap with the engine. I was thinking of getting JRSC, but I haven't heard many good things, just some horror stories. Besides, the JRSC costs a lot more then a swap and turbo. Keep the comments and tech advice coming! Thanks.
I wouldn't ever supercharge a 4 cylinder, ever. There just isn't as much room for gain as with a proper turbo system.
Unless you're just rolling in money, an auto turbo honda is not for you, but that's purely a reliability issue, not a functional one.
Unless you're just rolling in money, an auto turbo honda is not for you, but that's purely a reliability issue, not a functional one.
__________________
-Harry
AIM: NDcissive
CRX and Pre '92 Civic, Engine Tech and Tuning, & Track and Autocross Forum Mod
-Harry
AIM: NDcissive
CRX and Pre '92 Civic, Engine Tech and Tuning, & Track and Autocross Forum Mod


