GT or S2k
02-19-2005, 09:03 AM
#2
Change sig? Lose [quote]!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
0-60 = Mustang
Top end = S2000
Corners and fun driving = S2000
Fuel economy = S2000
Looks = S2000
I think the 5.0L from the 94 made like 230hp and 200tq, bhp, but I know I'm probably wrong.
Top end = S2000
Corners and fun driving = S2000
Fuel economy = S2000
Looks = S2000
I think the 5.0L from the 94 made like 230hp and 200tq, bhp, but I know I'm probably wrong.
02-19-2005, 10:39 AM
#3
NAM #0001
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kenton
0-60 = Mustang
Top end = S2000
Corners and fun driving = S2000
Fuel economy = S2000
Looks = S2000
I think the 5.0L from the 94 made like 230hp and 200tq, bhp, but I know I'm probably wrong.
Top end = S2000
Corners and fun driving = S2000
Fuel economy = S2000
Looks = S2000
I think the 5.0L from the 94 made like 230hp and 200tq, bhp, but I know I'm probably wrong.
With a competent driver the S2000 should beat it in nearly every category.
02-21-2005, 12:53 AM
#4
Power of Dreams
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Jose Ca
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeHJuSTiN
94 GT made 215hp 285tq.
With a competent driver the S2000 should beat it in nearly every category.
With a competent driver the S2000 should beat it in nearly every category.
thats correct
it's the 260 hp 99+ GTs that are closer to the S2000's class
in terms of handling the Honda wins hands down
i can walk all over a stock 94 Gt , so it shouldn't be compared to an S2000
02-21-2005, 09:13 AM
#6
Still here... sorta...
Originally Posted by PikkaGTR
thats correct
it's the 260 hp 99+ GTs that are closer to the S2000's class
in terms of handling the Honda wins hands down
i can walk all over a stock 94 Gt , so it shouldn't be compared to an S2000
it's the 260 hp 99+ GTs that are closer to the S2000's class
in terms of handling the Honda wins hands down
i can walk all over a stock 94 Gt , so it shouldn't be compared to an S2000
02-22-2005, 08:09 AM
#8
Domestic Driving Asshole
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Based on the original poster's question and the fact that he is even considering a GT, I'm going to make the assumption that he is more interested in 1/4 mile performance than handling ability/interior/etc. If that is the case, yes... stock for stock the S2000 will stomp the GT.
But if you want to have a "drag car" DO NOT buy an S2000. The would be a complete misuse of the car, and pretty much stupid. You could dump five thousand dollars in the GT and it would be FAR beyond what the S2000 is realistically capable of without forced induction.
But if you want to have a "drag car" DO NOT buy an S2000. The would be a complete misuse of the car, and pretty much stupid. You could dump five thousand dollars in the GT and it would be FAR beyond what the S2000 is realistically capable of without forced induction.
