Notices
Accord
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Wasn't to impressed with recent test on 2003 Accord V6 6 speed

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-12-2002, 07:48 PM
  #1  
2000accordV6
Member
Thread Starter
 
2000accordV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Wasn't to impressed with recent test on 2003 Accord V6 6 speed

I wasn't very impressed with the recent motor trend test of 2003 accord v6 6 speed. It rated it 0-60mph at 6.2 (what the 5 speed altima does) and its quarter mile at like 14.8 I believe. I know these are good #'s for an accord and yes I know that this accord can eat my 6th gen up, I still think it is capable of more than that. Anyone else agree?
Old 11-12-2002, 09:07 PM
  #2  
Ryu
Team Exgen
 
Ryu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

your forgetting something.... it is a family car...

if someone wanted a faster car i guess they would get something quicker...
Old 11-12-2002, 10:07 PM
  #3  
e3NiNe
#CustomUserTitle
 
e3NiNe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: glass case of emotion
Posts: 63,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have to say that the car hauls ass considering its supposed to have a wife, 2 kids and a dog in it. if you wanted something fast, take the 28K you'd spend on the loaded up Accord and get a Z.
Old 11-13-2002, 03:02 AM
  #4  
VTECseoul
i love my wife's (y)
 
VTECseoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

seeing that the Accord has lost weight compared to ours, maybe the 1st & 2nd gearing is too low for the 0-60mph test & is really geared for autocrossing/road races & not drag races.

the Celica GT-S has the same prob, it shifts into 3rd right at 55mph; that extra shifting causes a 1/4sec loss.
Old 11-13-2002, 10:05 AM
  #5  
Bay Accord
Senior Member
 
Bay Accord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sf Bay
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Get a WRX then, accord is FWD and slow anyways, i dont think its meant to be raced.
Old 11-13-2002, 10:13 AM
  #6  
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What do you want for $27,000? 6.2 is damned good...FWD gave it traction problems off the line....but look at the quarter mile time....14.3 seconds.

It's based off the family sedan Accord, but it's a 2-door only with the 6-speed.

And Bay Accord, how is the Accord slow? It's 0.4 seconds away from the WRX, which is nearly indecipherable unless you raced. Even then, it's a matter of driver skill.
Old 11-13-2002, 10:19 AM
  #7  
AccordSleeper
Former H22 Accord Owner
 
AccordSleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those tests are on cars that all the magazine people get to beat the piss out of, so that may take a few tenths off one that has had proper time to break in and driven more normally. You also have to remember that it has less torque than the Altima too. Either way it's leaps and bound better than anything else in it's price range. Who else offers that much car in a 2 door luxury coupe for that price.
Old 11-13-2002, 10:33 AM
  #8  
AadosX
Senior Member
 
AadosX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

First of all.. about the WRX... half a second is a huge difference, and the WRX is about 3k cheaper. But if you still dont think Accords are supposed to be fast, just wait till the 260 HP Accord comes out in January or so. Accords and all hondas for that matter have always been built with at least a little thought of performance in mind. Hince the Type-R's.
Old 11-13-2002, 10:39 AM
  #9  
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

260HP Accord? Also, a half a second is not decipherable when driving. It is, however...when racing.
Old 11-13-2002, 10:39 AM
  #10  
AccordSleeper
Former H22 Accord Owner
 
AccordSleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by AadosX
First of all.. about the WRX... half a second is a huge difference, and the WRX is about 3k cheaper. But if you still dont think Accords are supposed to be fast, just wait till the 260 HP Accord comes out in January or so. Accords and all hondas for that matter have always been built with at least a little thought of performance in mind. Hince the Type-R's.
The one in January is the 240 6sp coupe, if there is 260 coming am I'm missing something.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:37 PM.