Change Timing Belt? Or Not? 175,000
I had my car (1996 Honda Accord EX) in for service @ the dealer today for a tierod. They noticed my timing belt cover wasn't there.... I bought this car from a private owner, whom took very well care of the car.
Documented in the owners manual was the timing belt change @ 90,000.
The dealer reccomends I change the belt..... Should I
Documented in the owners manual was the timing belt change @ 90,000.
The dealer reccomends I change the belt..... Should I
A little chin music
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio - Rock 'n Roll capitol of the World
No cover = dirt, moisture, and other crap gets into your belt, cam and crankshaft pulley sprockets, and tensioner. Bad news.
Besides, this is an interference engine. If you snap the belt while driving, you'll probably say goodby to the head.
Besides, this is an interference engine. If you snap the belt while driving, you'll probably say goodby to the head.
Originally Posted by e3NiNe
timing belts are done every 90K. Since you don't know what the last owner did, go ahead and do it. It's well worth every dollar.
I really doubt the previous owner was that great if he left the timing cover off...or maybe he just didn't know any better. As fastball said, it's pretty bad to do.
First timing belt on the 4-bangers is 90k, and the following replacements should be done every 60k unless otherwise noted in the service manual. Even the DOHC motors are spec'd that way.
On the 6th Gen Accords, Honda says to change the Timing belt at 105k.
I had my timing and balancer belt changed for $345 at a Honda dealer. It was on a 02 Accord ex I-4.
I looked at the old belt after it was replaced and it still looked like it could last another 100k, still almost like new.
I had my timing and balancer belt changed for $345 at a Honda dealer. It was on a 02 Accord ex I-4.
I looked at the old belt after it was replaced and it still looked like it could last another 100k, still almost like new.


