Notices

Short intake vs Long intake...Confused????

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 04:11 PM
  #11  
bolt-on's Avatar
bolt-on
honda lover
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: m.a.r.z. mars bitches
Default

i have one of each since i live in minnesota short ram 4 winter and a v2 cai 4 the rest. if your planning on going turbo. dont buy either. if you stay n/a then do your homework and pick one thats good 4 your build.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #12  
bolt-on's Avatar
bolt-on
honda lover
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: m.a.r.z. mars bitches
Default

Originally Posted by flyromeo3
Your not gonna get any significant power from purchase an intake.
The only gain will be the noise coming from the intake at high rpm's.

stick to the short one.
whats significant to you? i noticed gains from both a short ram and a cai. granted its not in the same bolt on class as a turbo but since air is a huge factor in making power in the single and dual cam vtech and non vtech honda and acura engines. what are you talking about?
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #13  
wedley2's Avatar
wedley2
bboy Wesley West
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,390
Likes: 0
From: six-five-o
Default

Originally Posted by A_D
failed to be mentioned is also:

the short ram produces midrange RPM power, while the CAI produces higher range RPM power
it does?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 06:55 AM
  #14  
Intrepid241's Avatar
Intrepid241
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

Originally Posted by bolt-on
whats significant to you? i noticed gains from both a short ram and a cai. granted its not in the same bolt on class as a turbo but since air is a huge factor in making power in the single and dual cam vtech and non vtech honda and acura engines. what are you talking about?
I'm with you. I did notice gains with my old Short Ram and my current CAI. They weren't amazing but still better than stock.

Originally Posted by A_D
failed to be mentioned is also:the short ram produces midrange RPM power, while the CAI produces higher range RPM power
I've heard the same thing.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 10:33 AM
  #15  
bolt-on's Avatar
bolt-on
honda lover
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: m.a.r.z. mars bitches
Default

Originally Posted by A_D
failed to be mentioned is also:

the short ram produces midrange RPM power, while the CAI produces higher range RPM power
that make sense to me, especially with vtec kicking in. the new v2 cai seems to do it all.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 03:28 PM
  #16  
dosmastr's Avatar
dosmastr
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

it was a noticable gain? as in on a dyno or on the road driving?

cold air intakes, the way it works is as we all being high school students or grads know, the higher the temp of a gas, the more room it takes up, so you get more air in a fixed space like a cylinder when its cold then when its hot. however, more air means you need to put in more gas to keep the air/fuel ratio where it needs to be for most efficient combustion.... of course on this low of a level ( as opposed to a turbo which would be higher and much more sensative to air temp differences), i doubt it will be a noticable difference in fuel milage, unless its a noticable increase in power,
remember, the more horses you have on the farm, the more expensive it is to feed them all.


as for moving around the torque curve, i heard that exhaust headers has a little to do with that aswell. though i forget exactly what change move power to where.....
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 03:29 PM
  #17  
dosmastr's Avatar
dosmastr
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

bolt on, air is a huge factor in all engines, why did you have to make a list which included every honda engine type.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #18  
ODUB's Avatar
ODUB
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Default

get an AEM V2 CAI...it's the best one for that engine, it's the one i have on my 2000 I4...the regular CAI makes u lose all low end, the short ram is basically for decoration... i got my V2 for 250 shipped when they first came out from www.planetperformance.com check around cuz they might be cheaper by now, i dunno...good luck, peacE
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 06:23 PM
  #19  
uclaccord's Avatar
uclaccord
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Default

from all those many previous posts...i thought it was established that the cai produced gains in a more usable range (mid) and that the sri produced gains for the highest part of the power band (which is why u don't feel it)...not the other way around...do the searches and u'll find the info...and it's spelled VTEC!!!!...no 'H' please

*edit* btw...i've driven for a lil over 3 yrs in chicago w/a cai, no bypass valve, no hydrolock...don't be scared...just drive smart...no 16" puddles and ur fine
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 06:33 PM
  #20  
SonY:)AccOrd's Avatar
SonY:)AccOrd
GOSU
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
From: AmeRiKa
Default

Originally Posted by Eklypse39
quick notes ...

short ram intakes:
- filter element resides under the hood breathing not the coolest possible air, but the chance of hydrolocking is next to impossible. (unless you drive into a lake)

- less power, less risk, less cash

* i see SRI's as an investment. the filters are washable and it will pay for itself over time.

cold air intake:
- filter element is relocated outside of the engine compartment grabbing the coolest air possible, the chance of sucking water into the intake and locking up your engine is a sure bet if you live in a wet climate.

- more power, more risk, more money

* i see CAI's as true power producers. if you live in an area like seattle, florida, chicago, or region prone to heavy rainfall, forget it. it has more potential to do damage than produce gains.
there we go.. thats the best answer you could get
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:06 AM.