Originally posted by dliske
Let me know when you want to know who this college dropout is. He was not difficult to find...at all.
"Sanctions in Iraq" is not the original topic! It's mindless when all you do is look for something to copy and paste, in an attempt to make your point. It takes no original thought. Sure, I'd debate you on your interpretations and ideas, but neither I, nor others (I'm sure), want to waste time arguing about someones else's ideas.
Actually, this thread was doing quite well until YOU changed the topic to what effect the UN sanctions may be having on IRAQ. All other posts tended to keep with the original discussion.
The only point made here is that it takes no brainwork whatsoever to fill up a thread. All you need to know is "ctrl-c" and "ctrl-v".
Talking about off topic? Look at 98CoupeV6 talking about Germany and WW2? Fastball talking about WW1 and then how we defeated communism? Then you, yourself (dislike) prompted the discussion about a small comment made earlier about economic sanctions.
Originally posted by fastball
How are we arguing the 2000 election now? If you can't get on with life since then, there's no hope for you.
It was Blackmagicks Republican attempt to counter:
4)This war is going to cost the American taxpayer what? I think the last figure was around $8 BILLION for the first month of war and occupation. $8 BILLION!! Do you know how many school's we can build here in FL to ease overcrowding? With $8 BILLION we can finally balance the ****ing budget perhaps? 8 years of Clinton and RECORD economic stability and now 2 years into Emperor Bush's reign and $8 Billion into a war and a defecit instead of surplus like we had before. Perhaps we should just pay for this out of the Bush family's pocketbook? If you can buy the presidency, I'm sure you can afford to conquer Iraq.
I'm personally over the election, but when you live in FL, and you have to put up with his brothers BS (trust me, theres a lot EXAMPLE schloarships were cut that pissed me off), you tend to think "man, thats so convienent that it was FL having all those problems".
You guys are wondering why I responded to something you origionally posted and then saying I'm off topic. I was wanting to stay out of this conversation until an off topic comment about WW1 in the first place!