Originally posted by fastball
When there is continued refusal to abide by international law, these things justify a strike.
It's not the responsibility of the United States to enforce international law. It is however, the policy of the United States to not strike first.
It's clear who paid attention in their history and civics classes and who didn't. I am dissapointed in some of you. Some of you sound like the only thing you ever pay attention to is the next BMW or how many six speed Accords your dealer will get, and then base your opinions of what really matters on things other ignorant people tell you. But there are some things in life just a little more important. I guess I should expect some of what I see considering this is, afterall, a web site for car chat.
That's it! Everyone who disagrees with you is obviously wrong and on top of that they're uneducated.
Originally posted by 98CoupeV6
I agree fully here. I respect the liberals that bring forth good argumements and really know their stuff, but a lot of what I see here is babble about how Bush is a terrorist and how the Democrats could run the country so much better. How do they figure? Well, uh, err, Clinton had all those years of prosperity and he was a Democrat! (rolleyes) The part about us mistreating the arabs at Guantanamo is laughable. If the tables were turned and we were their prisoners and they had decimated nearly all of us after we attacked and killed many of their civilians, do you think that they would do anything but shoot us in the head and throw us in a ditch?
What they would do in the same position doesn't matter. Our country is supposedly (at least our government claims to be) better than that.