Notices

clear tail legality???

Old Jul 23, 2003 | 10:13 PM
  #1  
k.a.y's Avatar
k.a.y
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Hailey, Idaho
Default clear tail legality???

well, I WAS under the impression that clear tails were entirely illegal, but I saw the new Lexus SUV today, and it's stock tails are definately totally clear, with no visible red except the bulb inside. how is it those can be legal, but clear tails 4 our cars aren't?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2003 | 10:19 PM
  #2  
Civic2Scooby's Avatar
Civic2Scooby
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 28,282
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Default

because of the red lights in the rear bumper :thumbup:
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2003 | 11:13 PM
  #3  
Kai's Avatar
Kai
Rotorphile.
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,120
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

That, and their tails are DOT approved. Most aftermarket clears are not.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2003 | 11:57 PM
  #4  
SSCivic's Avatar
SSCivic
Swolen Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

I've heard many differeny stories. It depends on where you live mostly. There is no nationaly driving law that states that clear lights are illegal. You gotta do the research into where you live. I know that around here where I live in baltimore, different cops are under different impressions after I talk to them, along with lawyers. I used to work for a lawyer and I photocopied the Book of Torts on the legality of tail lights on motor vehicles, unfortunately I lost it, but I remember it saying that the rear lights on a motor vehicle must emit a red light for braking and an amber to red light for signaling. I can't remember if it said anything about red reflectors or not. Hope this helps. Do some legal research in your town. Hit the library :-)
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 05:34 AM
  #5  
westcoaststyle's Avatar
westcoaststyle
Still here... sorta...
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 2
From: CO
Default

The above is correct only in the sense that cops will or won't get you for them. Technically, if they're not DOT approved they're illegal anywhere.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 06:02 AM
  #6  
oc_civic's Avatar
oc_civic
mcc racing
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,264
Likes: 0
From: Southern New Jersey
Default

there is a law in most cities EVERYWHERE.. here it is called "alternate equipment to defeat inspection", OR they can get with the classic "unaproved equipment" the second is the best.. when you read it.. it basicly says your car has to be COMPLETELY stock all the time no matter what..
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 06:07 AM
  #7  
westcoaststyle's Avatar
westcoaststyle
Still here... sorta...
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 2
From: CO
Default

isn't it also "altering factory lighting"?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 06:10 AM
  #8  
oc_civic's Avatar
oc_civic
mcc racing
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,264
Likes: 0
From: Southern New Jersey
Default

Originally posted by westcoaststyle
isn't it also "altering factory lighting"?
we dont have that here... NJ just makes anything "modded" illegal.. lol its a VERY subjective law.. and hardley ever enforced.. we have fairly reasonable police officers.. youve seen my car.. lol i have been stoped and i have no tickets.. so its all in how you are i guess...
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 06:50 AM
  #9  
Jessica's Avatar
Jessica
ch1x0r
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,629
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

the old lexus SUVs had them too, along with a couple of other cars. even the ford f-150 has them (well, the lightning or something like that). there are some laws for modded one, but nobody really cares unfortunately. too bad, maybe less people would put them on their car.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 06:58 AM
  #10  
oc_civic's Avatar
oc_civic
mcc racing
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,264
Likes: 0
From: Southern New Jersey
Default

they should arrest people with "modded tail lights" well the ones that are imposible to see at least... they are SO annoying..
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:12 PM.