If you don't want understeer you need this :)
I don't mind understeer since I don't race or autox. It's fun to get the tires to complain a little once in a while. I guess not having it would be ideal, but anyway. Good find I guess, but if it's illegal for the track, (for safety reasons) I don't think I would want it.
Thread Starter
Honorary Moderator Alumni
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 8,735
Likes: 0
From: Someplace with cones=AUTO
Originally Posted by bluetwo
I don't mind understeer since I don't race or autox. It's fun to get the tires to complain a little once in a while. I guess not having it would be ideal, but anyway. Good find I guess, but if it's illegal for the track, (for safety reasons) I don't think I would want it.
__________________
Sponsored by: KAM Racing Sports, Falken Tires, Progress Technology, Brady's High Performance, Taggart Performance Engineering, Rotora Brakes
Autocross is: 90% driver, 5% car, & 5% CRAZY MOJO!
Autocross Help Page
Sponsored by: KAM Racing Sports, Falken Tires, Progress Technology, Brady's High Performance, Taggart Performance Engineering, Rotora Brakes
Autocross is: 90% driver, 5% car, & 5% CRAZY MOJO!
Autocross Help Page
Sorry I guess I meant certain autocross classes. Also it sort of seems like a wonder drug if you get my meaning... Doesn't it seem like it might be a little questionalble in the safety department?
Originally Posted by wilsel
32MM! 
Never seen one that big.

Never seen one that big.
:exactly: the aspec kit is pretty nice tho, especially the complete reinforcement kit.
Originally Posted by SpecialED
That bar is hollow, so any comparisons to conventional solid bars based merely on outer diameter are completely meaningless. It's a totally different animal. The only logical comparison data would be actual torsional stiffness across the two ends of the swaybar, which of course we don't have.


