Notices

new civic coupe ex HP

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 08:12 AM
  #1  
forcfedcivic's Avatar
forcfedcivic
Thread Starter
Yes, i drive a civic
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: northwest
Default new civic coupe ex HP

anybody know the HP in the new civic coupe ex's
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 09:24 AM
  #2  
str8edgexx's Avatar
str8edgexx
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,021
Likes: 0
From: Rockland County, NY
Default

Originally Posted by forcfedcivic
anybody know the HP in the new civic coupe ex's

127 Hp, 114 lb/ft.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 06:03 PM
  #3  
Hambone's Avatar
Hambone
.
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,654
Likes: 0
From: West Michigan
Default

It's kind of sad to have that little HP. They change to a 1.7, the car gets a bit bigger, and it has the same power as the 5th & 6th gens.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #4  
Mackenzie C's Avatar
Mackenzie C
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Default

yeah it is sad, at least it looks nice
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 07:26 PM
  #5  
CivicRacr's Avatar
CivicRacr
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Hambone
It's kind of sad to have that little HP. They change to a 1.7, the car gets a bit bigger, and it has the same power as the 5th & 6th gens.
but it feels like it has a better torque curve than the old D16s...
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 07:32 PM
  #6  
Hambone's Avatar
Hambone
.
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,654
Likes: 0
From: West Michigan
Default

If they'd just make a 2004 coupe with a B16......:rockon:
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 06:41 AM
  #7  
str8edgexx's Avatar
str8edgexx
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,021
Likes: 0
From: Rockland County, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Hambone
It's kind of sad to have that little HP. They change to a 1.7, the car gets a bit bigger, and it has the same power as the 5th & 6th gens.
:werd: Civic Exs have 2 more hp than they did in 1992...but also weigh close to 100 lbs more. 12 years, and only 2 hp You know honda could get more power out of that engine, and really not sacrafice too much gas mileage.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 07:32 AM
  #8  
supermac88's Avatar
supermac88
not OG but Old School
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, IN
Default

Honda is not trying to make horsepower heavy cars in case you haven't noticed... the Si is the same horsepower as the previous Si, and the Ex is almost the same as the last gen Ex. It's crap because both cars are heavier. On the flip side every test I have read about the cars is that they seem to be more powerful then their last gen counterparts.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 09:09 AM
  #9  
str8edgexx's Avatar
str8edgexx
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,021
Likes: 0
From: Rockland County, NY
Default

Originally Posted by supermac88
Honda is not trying to make horsepower heavy cars in case you haven't noticed... .
I understand that, but they've fallen behind the curve. Back in 1992 when the 5th gen came out, 125 hp was a lot, especially compared to the competiton. However, in 2004 lets look at the competition (equivalent models to EX):

Corrola: 130 hp
Sentra: 165 hp
Cavalier: 140 hp
Neon: 150 hp
Focus: 130 hp
Elantra: 138 hp
Mazda 3: 160 hp
Lancer: 120 hp
Ion: 140 hp

Now granted, I know most of these cars (ok, all of them except the Corrola) do not have Honda quality or reliability. However, the Civic would be second from the bottom on the list...thats kind of sad. They've fallen behind the curve. If they could bump their power output up to around 140 hp (which they could easily do with that 1.7L engine), they'd be back in the game.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 09:33 AM
  #10  
Civic2Scooby's Avatar
Civic2Scooby
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 28,282
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Hambone
If they'd just make a 2004 coupe with a B16......:rockon:
why the hell would they do that?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:39 PM.