http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/videop...10/video548745

Andy Rooney rules. Anyway. Both sides have their downfalls. Neither side is perfect. I'd pick the democrats, because at least they don't endorse people being close minded (i.e. lott, santorum, etc.). The republican party has a lot of old-school views on social things that impede on progress. It's 2003, get with it. Giving middle classed citezens a $600 or so tax cut a year isn't going to do much for them OR the economy. I worries me that so many people that are patriotic think that the democrats are unpatriotic. It wouldn't be a democracy if people couldn't question things. I don't like when Democrats go after Bush like he's the say all and end all to the Republican party. Concerning morals, I think that parents should teach morals, not the government. I also think that the government shouldn't go along with the Christian ways. I don't care if there are more Christians in the country, they should accept that there are other religions out there, like their own religion teaches them to. It's a funny thing, extreme Christians can sometimes be some of the nastiest people. It makes you wonder. Morals do not directly mean "church" OR "religion." Yes, to the few that care, you can be a good person and not belong to any religious affiliation. 9-11 didn't happen because of Clinton. Do we really need MORE military funding? If everybody who put a "support out troops" sticker on their car in times of [avoidable] all-out war, thinking they are rough tough (TRUE!) americans, were to enlist, the government wouldn't complain about needing more people in the military. I consider going into the reserves at 16, even if I don't like everything the military does. I think it's honorable, not because I want to make my republican parents happy. There's no single person to point the finger at about 9-11. You can't correlate the weak economy with Bush being in office. Both sides have their good points, both sides have their weak spots. Neither is perfect.