Originally posted by NVS
When you write the date, you say the year is 2003. Okay 2003. 2003 what? There has to be a 2nd object in relation to the year, or else it wouldn't make sense. It's like asking, what's the between a duck? There has to be a 2nd object, a constant. That constant being the birth of Christ. And if you say that this is the 2003rd year after the birth of Christ, then how can you be aetheist? You would be proving the innerancy of the Bible, would you not?
You have, quite frankly, been the dumbest person on this forum. Congratulations.
You're using an established convention. Do you actually think a yard is the length from your shoulder to fingertip?
Ask biblical scholars when they think Jesus was born. I'll give you a hint: They don't think it was the year 0 anymore. Should we change our calendars now? :jerkit: