Originally posted by 18secFerio
because I know I'm right.
No you are not. And you have yet to put forth any argument or point of view that is not grounded in half-truths or far left wing conspiracy theories.
As reported yesterday they have found possible WMD. And when I talk about WMD this is the definition I am going by...the one commonly understood by the world.
The term "weapons of mass destruction" has been used for decades to describe nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. It was first used by The Times of London in 1937 as World War II loomed, according to Wordorigins.org, an etymology Web site.
So please do not argue the semantics of your own personal interpretation against the commonly known defenition. Here is a link to the article...
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/i...-weapons_x.htm