Originally posted by 18secFerio
You missed my point. I don't care what the actual definition is. I was letting people know when I say WMD, I do not mean chem or bio weapons.
btw, it says this right on that page:
so basiclly you backed me up. thanks :thumbup:
I did nothing of the sort. I can pretty assuredly say that when I, DVPGSR, and others mention WMD, we are referring to NBC weapons (WMD). That page you refer to opines that the CURRENT definition should be changed because of the inherent differences in the weapon's technologies. You haven't argued that. You have simply stated Iraq doesn't possess WMD. You're talking apples when everyone else is talking oranges. All you needed to say was Iraq doesn't possess nuclear weapons, and there wouldn't be this wasted space.
David Liske