Originally posted by puffy
facts? excuse me but you are the one who said..
Thats not facts!
h:
Yes...because you started your post off by assuming this was 100% not a chemical weapons facility...I was pointing out the flaw in your argument that you can not assume for certain it is not. I gave you facts about the facility that compare it to other known chemical weapons facilities...facts that can lead one to conclude that the facility found is in fact a chemical weapons facility.