Thread: turbo or h22
View Single Post
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 03:01 PM
  #20  
Nightshade's Avatar
Nightshade
un-Touch'd krew
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 51,774
Likes: 1
From: My own level of hell
Default

Originally posted by 98AccordEX
since when? my boosted F23 put out 221hp and 238ft/lbs. stock block running 10lbs. last i checked the H22 with bolt-ons made around 180hp and 160ft/lbs MAX. i wouldnt consider a 41hp and 78ft/lbs difference to be about equal. i walk plenty of Preludes. i've also done plenty more upgrades since my last dyno numbers. those numbers are with an FMAX kit and exhaust. and a $20 manual boost controller. yeah maybe the turbo needs to change the oil a little more. my friend changes the oil in his Lude with synthetic. i am assuming it needs synthetic with the higher compression. and both need Premium fuel. theres no difference there

i would like to know the advantages of an H22 over a boosted F22/23. i'll give you the advantages of the boosted F23

1. more power
2. more power
3. more power

btw. my car has been boosted for over a year. 100,035 miles on it. and full compression in all 4 cylinders
My H22 is going up to 248 by the end of this month....difference being is that it is constant power.....no waiting for the turbo to spool up and kick in...no added maintenence...oh and I started at 185hp to the wheels.

Not trying to be difficult but just saying the stability in an NA motor vs a boosted motor is enormously different and if you read his original post you will see why I recommend the swap over the turbo........he is lacking knowledge of how it all works in general and may cause more harm than good.

BTW you don't mention in your post but I assume you also had your internals gone through before the boost was hooked up....right?
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Reply