Thread: The War
View Single Post
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 07:07 PM
  #58  
Bl@ck's Avatar
Bl@ck
Sinner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

Originally posted by Slow-N-Low
That's a lovely straw man argument. But of course Iraq is a country, not a city. Small children know that, but it obviously escapes you. And the last time I checked, we are not "at bloody war" with Iraq, so your excuse is invalid. Even if we do go to war, dropping atomic bombs and killing millions of innocent civilians in this age of surgical air strikes and smart bombs is nothing short of mass murder

The irony is not lost on me that red-toothed monsters such as yourself who advocate killing and destruction, using weapons of mass destruction against innocent civilians also use the excuse that it's all to stop the use of weapons of mass destruction against innocent civilians.
no kidding, are you sure? nothing gets past you turbo(i hope you picked up on the sarcasm because it was laid on pretty thick). that statement was in reference to your allusion that the dropping of fat man and little boy were "terrorist" attacks. when they were dropped we WERE in bloody war. nice to see you still have trouble taking statements in context though. that alone further discredits most of your feeble arguments not to mention you blatant show of frustration that manifests its self in you calling other people names. welcome to 3rd grade i guess.

That proves that you lack the brainpower to understand simple concepts like context. The analogy between the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and "I think we should use Iraq as the "test site" to make sure are nuclear weapons work." are obvious to people who aren't imbeciles.


wow, the irony. i fully understood what you were trying to say, the fact of the matter is that that perception is skewed beyond belief when you look at the facts.

You even disgraced yourself by failing to understand that the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were built at Los Alamos, not tested there. Again you prove what an ignorant ass you are.


i concede that point, however, at least i did get the state right. the first atomic tests were at trinity test site outside of alamogordo, NEW MEXICO. which, as a matter of fact, is about 260 miles from los alamos. the nevada test site wasn't opened until the early 50's. who "disgraced" who?

That's a myth based on pure speculation. The truth is that when those bombs were dropped, Japan was already beaten, and was already negotiating surrender with the Soviets. And of course, the ironic excuse of killing millions to save thousands is totally bogus.


when were millions killed. approximately 75,000 died at nagasaki, and approximately 80,000 at hiroshima. in what world does that add up to millions? and the kicker is.... they didn't even consider surrender until the second bomb had been dropped. i don't know where you get your speculation from, but the facts are there. you just have to look deeper than your own need to feel smart.

The facts prove that you're the ignorant fool who knows little about history. The fact that I am a moral person who chooses to do what is right and good, and you choose hatred and false pride only makes you look worse.
there ya go, calling names again. apparently i know more about history than you with your falsities that you try to pass off as fact. i think it's funny that you try to belittle me by saying the things that you do when in reality you know absolutely nothing about me. i happen to live by a strict standard of morals, but i, unlike you, seem to have the ability to use reason and common sense.
Reply