hmm, well, in any case, i believe 5.5 is more believable than 16.9, plus im sure that 16.9 is at the crank. . .and probably for a car more poorly tuned than the civic ex.

I suppose we'll see. I'm sure SCC will do a real series of tests soon. As for the reputation of turbo magazine, I don't have a clue, i grabbed it off the store shelf becuase it said AEM V2 test on it. If its legit, it looks good to me though. Even if it isnt 16.9 on the civic EX, if turbo magazines dynojet is even close, the V2 is 200% more powerful than the regular CAI. . .at least for that application.