Originally posted by DVPGSR:
Slow-N-Low...since you yourself are not in Iraq how can you conclude that I am the one that is lying?
Read my post, it's all there. The weapons inspectors, who are there, say there aren't weapons, and you say there are. But you have no proof.
And if you watched the State of the Union address last night Bush did an excellent job of clearly illustrating the reasons why we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. The exact reasons that I am speaking of.
That's a function of your willingness to believe whatever Bush says, without question. I do question things, and have to say that Bush's "sound bite" excuses just don't hold water.
And like Bush said last night the weapons inspectors are not in Iraq to conduct some scavanger hunt...it is up to Iraq to show where the weapons are and destroy them or to show proof that the weapons and biological and chemical agents they had during the last rounds of inspections have been destroyed.
Problem is, they don't work for Bush! The UN, who they do work for, says they're there to find weapons, hidden or not.
And this is nothing like Minority Report...at all. OBL and Al Quaida have committed many terrorist attacks against the US at home and abroad...that alone is enough to go after them.
So why do you want us to waste our time in Iraq when we have more important things to do?
Maybe had Clinton's action followed up what he said we would not be in the situation we are in today.
That's mighty vague. Let me know if you ever come up with specifics to back up that blanket condemnation.
After the first World Trade Center bombing we should have gone after OBL and his network of terrorists.
Should have? What about all those people who are sitting in US jails right now? What about the Al Quaeda camps that Clinton bombed? What about all those FBI agents who were hard at work on just that? Something was done, and this game pretending otherwise is getting old.
In the case of Iraq Saddam Hussein has been in violation of UN resolutions for 12 years. How much longer does he need to keep violating them?
If you can't figure out that "UN" is not "US", you really shouldn't post here. Obviously Clinton was not responsible for the UN!
And why does he need those weapons? The simple truth is he doesn't.
Not your call, and not enough reason to start a war.
And the weapons inspectors have found weapons...16 artillery shells that are illegal for him to have because they have the ability to transport chemical or biological agents. This was not in their report to the UN on the state of their WOMD...
Before you fall over patting yourself on the back, you should know that the shells were empty. No sale.
and like Bush said last night where are the other 29,984 similar shells that he had the last time inspectors were there?
They were supposed to be destroyed. If you're saying that George H. W. Bush failed to do that when he had the opportunity, then I have to say that I want someone better than his son to take that case over.
Again I have proven you wrong.
LOL..whatever you say...
And since you have such a short term memory I will give you a little refresher course. It was you that started the personal attacks when you told me to put a bullet in my head...and for that you are an asshole.
That right there is an example of your personal attacks, and it has to stop. All I did was illustrate how insane your line of reasoning was. I never told you to kill yourself. Your faulty logic made you look like an idiot, and you're mad. That's your fault, not mine. Get over it.
Other than me calling you what you are for making such an inappropriate comment for a discussion board there has not been one personal attack on you by me. So please enlighten me on how I have personally attacked you...and please stop the hypocrasy...
There's another example right there.
Well it's obvious that you are out of relevant things to say. Since you finish your post with nothing but personal attacks, there's no reason to continue. If you have anything to say about the topic "War with Iraq" I'll be happy to oblige you. But if you persist in the hateful personal rhetoric, I'll let the moderators do the talking. This is a serious issue that needs to be discussed.