Slow-N-Low...since you yourself are not in Iraq how can you conclude that I am the one that is lying? And if you watched the State of the Union address last night Bush did an excellent job of clearly illustrating the reasons why we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. The exact reasons that I am speaking of. And like Bush said last night the weapons inspectors are not in Iraq to conduct some scavanger hunt...it is up to Iraq to show where the weapons are and destroy them or to show proof that the weapons and biological and chemical agents they had during the last rounds of inspections have been destroyed.

And this is nothing like Minority Report...at all. OBL and Al Quaida have committed many terrorist attacks against the US at home and abroad...that alone is enough to go after them. Maybe had Clinton's action followed up what he said we would not be in the situation we are in today. After the first World Trade Center bombing we should have gone after OBL and his network of terrorists. In the case of Iraq Saddam Hussein has been in violation of UN resolutions for 12 years. How much longer does he need to keep violating them? And why does he need those weapons? The simple truth is he doesn't. And the weapons inspectors have found weapons...16 artillery shells that are illegal for him to have because they have the ability to transport chemical or biological agents. This was not in their report to the UN on the state of their WOMD...and like Bush said last night where are the other 29,984 similar shells that he had the last time inspectors were there? Again I have proven you wrong.

And since you have such a short term memory I will give you a little refresher course. It was you that started the personal attacks when you told me to put a bullet in my head...and for that you are an asshole. Other than me calling you what you are for making such an inappropriate comment for a discussion board there has not been one personal attack on you by me. So please enlighten me on how I have personally attacked you...and please stop the hypocrasy...you quote only what you need to make an argument no matter how much of a half truth it is. If you did keep up you would know that what Bush is talking about is not heresay, and he is actually telling the truth. I already listed many news sources that I get my information from...some of the very liberal (New York Times) that have written stories that support the position that myself, President Bush, and many others in this country know.