Thread: War with Iraq
View Single Post
Old Jan 25, 2003 | 05:07 PM
  #66  
Slow-N-Low's Avatar
Slow-N-Low
What's that smell?
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by DVPGSR:

I hardly consider using cruise missiles to take out a couple tents and some camels in Afghanistan counts as "going after" Al Quaida.

That hardly mitigates the fact that you lied outright in your zeal to portray Clinton as devil and Bush as savior. Whether you like it or not, Clinton was proactive against Al Quaeda.

There were also no FBI investigations that were shut down under Bush...way to make that one up.

You're the only one making things up here.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/knew/

Maybe if Clinton had had the balls to go and get these terrorists they would have not gotten to us first. Be thankfull we now have a president that is doing that.

A. This is reality, not "Minority Report."
B. Osama Bin Laden is still free.


And we do know I raq has weapons...they were discovered during the last round of inspections...now they are missing and Iraq cannot account for them nor prove they were destroyed.

Unless you're one of those weapons inspectors, you're spouting pure BS.

And remember Muhammad Atta met with Iraqi officials in Prague before flying into the WTC...I doubt it was a courtesy visit.

That has been proven to be BS.

And even if their is no definative proof that Iraq had anyting to do with terrorist attacks agains AMerica or American interests I don't want to give Saddam the chance for their to be a first time...and you shouldn't either!

Practice what you preach. If that's how you want things done, start by putting a bullet in your own head, so you will not have a chance to do anything wrong.