Thread: War with Iraq
View Single Post
Old Jan 25, 2003 | 01:45 PM
  #63  
DVPGSR's Avatar
DVPGSR
I need sleep...
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
From: NH
Default

Originally posted by Slow-N-Low
Originally posted by DVPGSR:

Right...so 8 years of terrorist bombings on American interests around the world and Clinton did nothing to OBL.

Wrong! Clinton was the first to fight back against Al Quaeda bases in Afghanistan, the Sudan and a couple of other places. In addition, the Clinton administration investigated, arrested, prosecuted and jailed a number of people who were responsible for terrorist attacks. In contrast, Bush put on a big show in Afghanistan, but let Al Quaeda walk right out of there.

Clinton could have done a lot more if the GOP hadn't been working to undermine his presidency at every turn. When he had the opportunity to neutralize Al Quaeda military targets, the GOP launched a massive "wag the dog" smear campaign. FBI investigations begun under the Clinton administration were abruptly shut down when Bush came to power. In particular, FBI agent John O'Neoll was hot on the trail of three suspects from the USS Cole bombing. When they came to the US to learn to fly jets, O'Neill wanted to arrest them; Bush said "no". And what happened?

What happened...9/11.

Those three men who were within our grasp went on to fly airliners into the WTC and Pentagon, thanks to George W. Bush.

Now Bush is going after people with the weapons and the motive to hit us again...

What weapons? What motive? If you're talking about Iraq, the "weapons" are nothing but heresay at this point. Sane people don't start war on nothing but rumors. Even if Iraq did have the weapons, they have no way of getting them all the way to the US. Oh, let's not forget that Iraq never "hit us" a first time, so to say "hit us again" is dishonest.

I mean really...have you not learned from history?

Obviously some of us have, despite your best attempts to confuse the issue.
You are so off base with all your information...I hardly consider using cruise missiles to take out a couple tents and some camels in Afghanistan counts as "going after" Al Quaida. There were also no FBI investigations that were shut down under Bush...way to make that one up. The reason that those three got away was because when the INS was given their names they lost them. You can't blame Bush for that. Maybe if Clinton had had the balls to go and get these terrorists they would have not gotten to us first. Be thankfull we now have a president that is doing that. And we do know I raq has weapons...they were discovered during the last round of inspections...now they are missing and Iraq cannot account for them nor prove they were destroyed. And remember Muhammad Atta met with Iraqi officials in Prague before flying into the WTC...I doubt it was a courtesy visit. And even if their is no definative proof that Iraq had anyting to do with terrorist attacks agains AMerica or American interests I don't want to give Saddam the chance for their to be a first time...and you shouldn't either!