Thread: simma don nah
View Single Post
Old 01-10-2003, 09:46 AM
  #12  
K i o n
TrackDemon
 
K i o n's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by SVTFocus
I drive a Ford Mustang GT boosting 10lbs a daily driven 11 sec car, I drive a fully built 1990 Honda CRX SI on original 1.6 SOHC motor, I also drive the new SVT Focus, and my fiance drives a 1998 Nissan SE-R. So obviously I'm not a stupid Ford fanboy, I enjoy all cars and I'm not stupid enough to put faith in just one auto manufacturer, cuz they all want your money in the end. I was simply bring up the point that the new Acura RSX Type-S seems to dyno lower HP numbers than advertised, and when I spoke to Oscar Jackson about it at a local Ford Focus meet, he agreed and said when they engineered they're SC for that car, he agreed and said that Acura fibbed on the HP numbers. I'm not saying my SVT is better, cuz I agree that FORD quality generally sucks, my honda has been super reliable no doubt, but the new RSX Type-S seems to be weak in HP ratings in my opinion, please don't flame.
i'm simply questioning why you would start such a thread based on as flimsy an assumption as that (anyone who sells a product to improve the RSX-S's engine performance would definitely be inclined to downplay its stock performance, duh, oscar jackson/AEM included). superchargers are lame, once again. oscar jackson is similarly lame.

anyway you started a huge argument based on a crappy assumption, trolling around and expecting to provoke a number of defensive responses and yet you tell me not to flame? like it or not, you have a username that implies you are a fanboy, and you're on a honda board in the RSX section. doesnt matter what else you drive cuz in this case it looks like you're just a troll looking to cause trouble, even if that's not true. so, whatever bud, if you can't stand the heat...
K i o n is offline