Thread: cloning
View Single Post
Old Dec 31, 2002 | 02:19 AM
  #6  
Bl@ck's Avatar
Bl@ck
Sinner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

Originally posted by Deagle
What I don't see is why cloning is wrong. For all intensive purposes a clone is exactly the same thing as a twin. The only difference is the method of conception. Are we worried that eventually people will just clone themselves to procreate instead of having real babies, so we'll have removed evolution from the equation?

What I don't like is the casual attitude that's being taken towards genetic modification. Things like growing bigger, healtier, and more disease resistant crops from genetic modification is simply too easy to do. Catastrophic accidents could happen which would decimate our food supply. Even breeding cattle is sketchy, because it makes them more suceptable to disease through the commonality of their genes. They should apply the same regulations to altering foods as they to do altering human genes.
finally... someone on this board that makes sense.