Originally Posted by
LABARINTH
There was a study done (to lazy to search for it) that found that because of the amount of peer review wiki was more reliable than even scientific journals. Of course that doesn't mean every article is 100% accurate.
just sayin
Well then you go ahead and quote the Wiki in your next paper and see how far it gets ya
Not really arguing the point but it is too open to fallacies for the same reasons you state for it's accuracies.
Most of academia still will reject any argument based on it's postings on principal alone.