View Single Post
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 01:57 PM
  #18  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshade
I would hate storing that much info on a flash drive especially if it gets tossed or fails in some manner. Thats a huge risk
Sounds like a lot but it really isn't. It just means that the quality of what we have will no longer suck

80 BD-ROMS would cap that format out, think a quarter of the max being 500GB, thats 40 BD-25's and only 20 BD-50's

If camera CCD's get much better everyone might start storing raw sensor data from 3 separate CCD's, something that isn't quite possible now. A few short years ago they used iPods to hold the lord of the rings trilogy scenes for transport, because it's al that was really availible. That was already with mass amounts of compression

:edit:
300MB per second could empty a 2GB in less than 10 seconds

Last edited by sherwood; Jan 8, 2009 at 02:00 PM.
Reply