Originally Posted by
fathergoat
you're right, they should have bombed cafes, night clubs, and buses instead.
I'm just sick of this double standard bullshit. An American can't walk a dog past a shirtless Iraqi without some hippie crying foul. But Iraqis chop the head off a reporter with a rusty knife and "that's just the only way they know to fight back". Face it, the only reason people are defending those people is because they hate America. If this was some French woman bombing and Italian school we would all agree that it's fucked up. So why can't we all just agree that targeting innocent people is fucked up and wrong regardless of who it is?
Who the fuck said it was ok? and who is defending "these people"? Just because the members are saying that "these people" do it because they feel like this is there only way out it doesn't meant hat we agree with what they are doing.
If by miracle russia invades the USA take control of the the gouvernment and all its assets, killed thousands of innocent people and hunt down any group that create resistense to the new gouvernment. they take away your arms. whats is it that the population would do? youd stay there and be controled? or would you create groups, societies, cells and try to rebel. Still it doesn't work, they keep controling everything you do. you might fight back with mortars but if you do that they send f16 to bomb you... so i ask you would you do? how would you get the attention of the world?