View Single Post
Old Nov 9, 2002 | 01:43 PM
  #15  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Oh lord.

The B16A/B17A (PR3) head and B18C1 (P72) heads flow almost identically. The biggest differernce at any point on that graph is ~2.5 CFM which is completely insignifigant.

The PR3 head has a higher combustion chamber volume. This means that it provides a slightly lower compression ratio than the P72 head. Similarly, the Type-R motors use a hand-ported version of the PR3 head with their own intake manifold. The larger combustion chambers mean a larger surface area which in turn makes the head a bit easier to repeat the same port job over a production line. One could also argue that the PR3 head provides more generous "squish" area for high-CR running.

If you put a Type-R PR3 head on a flow bench I guarantee it would produce noticeably better numbers than a PR3 off a B16A or B17A.

Now I swear that I've typed this exact reply in any number of threads, even down to responding to dubster99's freakin flow bench graph. Geez people, yall aren't very creative at ALL.
Reply