Thread: CSS v.WebDesign
View Single Post
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #16  
reno96teg's Avatar
reno96teg
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 21,573
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MarshyTheKid
I suppose you're going to say tables are the way to go? Tables are bad practice. They render differently in IE and FF and Opera. They are TERRIBLE with screen readers, which is a huge part of the company(It being a Blind Non Profit). And they are slower to load than CSS pages.
i don't think that's what he's saying, but i've also noticed this "tables bad, divs good" nonsense for a while now.

in real world scenarios, it ends up being a mix. there is no way you can convince me that it's possible to do everything in divs without turning your html into an unreadable, complicated mess. either that, or your pages are mindlessly simple.

to rule out an entire set of objects because of some nonsense mantra is ludicrous.

i do what i can to keep to divs, but once it's clear that i have a fight on my hands, i start looking at tables. i'd rather focus my energy on the more important code.

p.s. and divs often don't behave the same across different browsers either! :shhh:

Last edited by reno96teg; Jun 20, 2008 at 10:22 AM.
Reply