Originally Posted by
MarshyTheKid
I suppose you're going to say tables are the way to go? Tables are bad practice. They render differently in IE and FF and Opera. They are TERRIBLE with screen readers, which is a huge part of the company(It being a Blind Non Profit). And they are slower to load than CSS pages.
actually isnt IE the only company that has different rendering practices then opera, safari, and firefox? safari and firefox are spot on.
div's are the way to go, but w3 is stupid.
first frames were good they say. but then high school kids learned how to do it, so they move to tables. then high school kids learned how to program it. so now its div tags.
i think its a conspiracy by the W3 to try to keep jobs out of high schoolers. cause they realize html is so easy they are trying to complicate it beyond what it needs to be. xml i
at. except for rss.
also with div tags you need to use positioning system, but i ie gave that stuff up after ie4. so i am confused a bit. one of the products we offer where i work copies website templates of sites. ever since this div thing, the templates have been a pain in the ass to copy and often dont turn out right.