Originally Posted by
NOPD
From what I've read, it seems the case is based upon the "bad brakes." If the bus had proper working brakes then Keith's dad wouldn't have died. I didn't see anywhere that said the bus rear ended him. Seem like another car hit him from the back and then he flew onto oncoming traffic where he was killed by the bus.
It should be then the car who rear-ended him that should get all the blame.
Yea that's what i gathered. He was driving one side, bumped by car behind him, he swerved into the other lane and hit the bus. But because the bus had bad brakes the bus company was sued for negligence.
I don't think that makes much sense due to the fact that what does the bus's breaks has to do with someone coming at you. I guess it's one of those "you gotta be there" things.