Originally Posted by
losiglow
But Hilldog or Edwards are better? They'd just as soon pull out of Iraq like it never happened, let the middle eastern crazies nuke each other to death and give us a nice thick nuclear winter for a few years. I highly doubt Guiliani is going to keep milking the war like Bush but he probably won't pull out like a pornstar either. And Mitt is no more a flipper than any other candidate. Truth is you have to pick the lesser of the evils and Hillary or Edwards are certainly not the lesser. Obama possibly, but not the others.
you're an ass... This administration has still clames that Iran has nukes... wich it does not and will not. Yet they still clame they have the intelligence to acquire nukes. Thanks Jack asses... I'd like to have the knowledge of what it takes to make a million dollars.
And BTW, Romney has flip flopped more then anyone. It's like a daily problem for this guy. Maybe I'm wrong... maybe he actually believes in his made up candy land world... kinda like how his dad and MLK jr appeared in a city that holds no documents of the king marching with his dad, who um allegedly marched at the same time( who was in France at the time being - ugh... preaching mormanism).
AND!!... and, no one is just gonna pull out nukes on one another. It just doesn't work like that. And if someone did, please tell me who it would be??
In the meantime, where's Bin Laden? Who's tryin to catch this guy? I see where our priorities are...
And I never said Hillary or edwards are better... I simply wont endorse them. Hillary is bush in disguise with a liberal twist and Edwards is a socialist. Dodd is our next Vice President with Obama as his boss
