lol, you have to be joking? Obviously I have nothing to hide or I wouldn't be posting on this forum. This was my last reply to your post, in which you refused to give me any answers to:
"Backed out of my word? Did I miss something? I told you I will sell the Polks to the highest offer on Monday. You said you would give me $85 plus shipping and pay via c2it.com. I said I don't have an account with c2it. I received a higher offer on Sunday and they were sold to the highest offer on Monday. You did not send me money, I did not say they were sold to you or that I would hold them for you. My ad says "or best offer", did you think I was going to hold them for you because you gave me an offer?
As I said in my e-mail to you - Show me where we had any kind of verbal agreement. Post your reply here if you'd like. I have a feeling I won't be receiving any response from you."
Your reply to this and my e-mail was that you didn't want to waste your precious time arguing with me. I guess that isn't the case now? If you want to say I went "back on my word" on a public forum, you'd better be able to back your accusations. The facts remain in my post I quoted above. If you want to argue them, I will post our entire IM conversation right here.
Obviously you haven't done many Internet transactions. People do not hold items for you just because you give them an offer.
I told you, as clear as a bell, in our IM conversation: "I'm selling them to the highest offer on Monday, unless someone purchases them for my asking price before then." You did not purchase the components, therefor I sold them to the highest offer on Monday just like I said I would. What part of this don't you understand?
Again, show me where we had any kind of agreement in our IM conversation, and I will gladly admit fault. Until then you are just spewing out crap about someone you don't know. If you want to argue with me, then go ahead, I will make you look stupid.
-Eric Johnson