View Single Post
Old Feb 2, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #7  
TheOtherDave™'s Avatar
TheOtherDave™
Apathy Kills
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 60,714
Likes: 0
From: The Left Lane
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshade
Ok but then the argument comes up that it is agreed in science that vegetation (trees and plants etc.) are alive. They do not have a sentient force to speak of but do contain life. The same couls be said of cells and other things on a micro scale.

So if using this logic then it tosses up a big question as to what actually constitutes life or a living "being" so to speak.
Yep... there's a lot of grey area when you get to the cellular level.

Since plants do respond to stimuli ( a lack of water or wildly fluctuating temps) then you could bend the rules and call it sentinence at a basic level.

And then you get into plant families like Nepenthaceae (pitcher plants) which are carnivorous rather than photosynthetic.

At the plant level, the evolutionary clock slows down a bit. Usually. h:
__________________
:: :ToDspin: - supermod - but who gives a shit?

:: HAN Integra FAQ: If, by some miracle, yours hasn't been stolen... check it out!
Reply