Originally Posted by
reno96teg
duff man, if you want to be taken seriously, you need to stop referencing these ridiculous conspiracy theories. you know full well that there is voter fraud on both sides of the aisle.
and everyone knows that the dems love to bring busloads of homeless people to the voting booths in exchange for a sandwich. that is not an informed voter, and this is partly why i think IDs should be required. not that i think this legislation will stop them from committing this unethical act, but it's something.
so if IDs need to be free to allow this to pass, let's do it. i'll gladly pay a little more in taxes for that.someone who is aware of the candidates, their history, what they stand for, and the process in general…
you referenced amendment 24?
I wouldn't say that a multi-million dollar operation is equivalent to tire slashing, but yes, both sides commit voter fraud.
I agree, a public ID card could solve this issue. I also believe that Public Campaign/finance reform will solve a good portion of voting issues. I also believe that this will convert us from a two party system to a multiparty system. This would allow individuals like (and I stress the word "like" because both these folks have money) Perot and Nader would have stronger voices. Green party affiliates along with liberatarians...etc.
A win win
Imagine the day that we vote for 1 out of 6 extreamly competent presidential options....not two...not a blue state/red state affiliation. Not a "I have more money so I can advertise and hire better PR" thing. I want a leader...not a damn plastic politician. Not a "I swing this way and they swing that way" option. It's not one or the other. You guy's would be suprised as how centrist I stand. And for whatever it's worth, I'm a strong believer and supporter in Mark Warner for 08....Southerners agree and this guy can make things happen.