Originally Posted by
Duff Man
Moore is no different then Coulture. Radical extreamists that want the controversy and the sale.
To use this, Tom, would be saying that Republicans held huge screening parties for Coulture's book release.
I wouldn't use Moore as a Democratic spokes model. I have not seen Farenheight 911 and do not plan to. I probably won't see his new release either. Extreamists have no place in politics. They should be weeded out and disregarded.
Moore gets denied interview requests on talk shows because he's so obnoxious, Coulture gets fired from every job because she's purely cold hearted and deranged...
I am not sure if Republicans held screening parties for Coulter's books but the Democrats sure did about F911.
Link
Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe says he believes radical filmmaker Michael Moore's assertion that the United States went to war in Afghanistan not to avenge the terrorist attacks of September 11 but instead to assure that the Unocal Corporation could build a natural gas pipeline across Afghanistan for the financial benefit of Vice President Dick Cheney and former Enron chief Kenneth Lay.
McAuliffe and a number of other prominent Democrats attended a screening of Moore's new documentary, Fahrenheit 9/11, at the Uptown Theatre in Washington Wednesday night. McAuliffe called the film "very powerful, much more powerful than I thought it would be." When asked by National Review Online if he believed Moore's account of the war in Afghanistan, McAuliffe said, " I believe it after seeing that."
Moore may not be an official spokes model for the DNC but he sure did influence Terry McAuliffe. How's that pipeline working out Terry?