Wait. Let's reread your post:
Originally Posted by
DVPGSR
Democrats love it when Michael Moore makes a hitpiece on Republicans or any other subject that they are against. But when someone writes a movie that is largely based on factual evidence they cry foul. Pathetic.
So you are saying that Republicans are pathetic as well? In that case, I apologize for the assumption.
As for the show:
“The following dramatization…has composite and representative characters and incidents, and time compressions have been used for dramatic purposes.”
That was the disclaimer. The show was toeing a very fine line. The fact that there WAS complaining is good, as it let most people watch it with a critical eye.
The guy has no right to complain. He made a movie that entered into the realm of politics, and put some quesionable facts into it. And questionable they are. Many historians, politicians, and experts question the factuality of those few lines...that is enough to deem them 'questionable', don't you think?
EDIT: Before anyone gets their panties in a bunch, I did not mean that he does not have a legal right... Simply that he should have expected it.