Originally Posted by lexusis350
The interior of the Solara sucks. Bad quality, looks ugly and not as nice as other cars. The CLK is much better looking on the inside.
ok...are you sure you were in a "real" Solara...the interior is one of the nicer ones you can find in a sub $30k convertible...let's just look it its main competition:
Chrysler Seabreeze (I'm making Pun to the douche brand)
Mustang Convertible
PT Cruiser
Mitsubishi Eclipse
Pontiac G6
(maybe a low end A4 convertible or a 3 series convertible)
you are comparing it to a $50k Benz?...what a crock...the Solara costs shy of $30k...at least get apples to apples...even the SLK costs $40k
so it doesn't have as nice an interior as a car costing $20k more...what'd you expect...but for the money the Solara is one of the higher quality designs of its price range